2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovering worst fire scenarios in subway stations: A simulation approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, subway fire can cause a large number of casualties and property damage. Zhang et al [ 4 ] mainly classified the hazards of fire into three categories: heat, toxic gases, and smoke in his numerical simulation. Inhalation of high temperature gas may cause edema of tracheal mucosa and lead to death; excessive inhalation of toxic gases can cause coma and even death [ 5 ]; smoke from the fire worsens the situation and causes choke and poor visibility [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, subway fire can cause a large number of casualties and property damage. Zhang et al [ 4 ] mainly classified the hazards of fire into three categories: heat, toxic gases, and smoke in his numerical simulation. Inhalation of high temperature gas may cause edema of tracheal mucosa and lead to death; excessive inhalation of toxic gases can cause coma and even death [ 5 ]; smoke from the fire worsens the situation and causes choke and poor visibility [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical evaluation method of evacuation safety is regarded as a safe evacuation if the condition of ASET > RSET is satisfied from the comparison of ASET obtained from the fire analysis result and RSET obtained from the evacuation analysis [49,50]. However, since ASET > RSET is used as a judgment on the safe evacuation environment, it is impossible to quantitatively determine whether a fire effluent affects evacuee and causes death during the time taken along the evacuee evacuation route [51][52][53]. In addition, this evaluation method is likely to be overestimated, as it is considered a risk if there is any limit value for evacuation risk in space, regardless of the size of the danger zone.…”
Section: Estimate Of Fatalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] As the 1995 Baku Subway fire in Azerbaijan with more than 286 deaths and 270 injuries, and 2003 Daegu Subway in South Korea with 189 deaths are considered to be the deadliest subway disasters in the world. [5][6][7] On the other hand, the panic among the population caused by such incidents, precipitates secondary incidents increasing the destructive impact of the whole incidents. [8][9][10] For instance, the sudden braking and stopping of the Guangzhou Subway in 2013 caused the passengers of the last wagon to flee to the front of the wagon with terror leading to a number of injuries due to the stampede of the population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%