2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of 1-{(3R,4R)-3-[({5-Chloro-2-[(1-methyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)amino]-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl}oxy)methyl]-4-methoxypyrrolidin-1-yl}prop-2-en-1-one (PF-06459988), a Potent, WT Sparing, Irreversible Inhibitor of T790M-Containing EGFR Mutants

Abstract: First generation EGFR TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib) provide significant clinical benefit for NSCLC cancer patients with oncogenic EGFR mutations. Ultimately, these patients' disease progresses, often driven by a second-site mutation in the EGFR kinase domain (T790M). Another liability of the first generation drugs is severe adverse events driven by inhibition of WT EGFR. As such, our goal was to develop a highly potent irreversible inhibitor with the largest selectivity ratio between the drug-resistant double mu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This competition profile contrasted with that observed for WT-EGFR, as measured in A431 cells, where probe labeling of a 170 kDa protein (in this case, using probe 7 that targets WT-EGFR (Lanning et al, 2014)) was competed by second-generation inhibitors such as afatinib, but less substantially by the third-generation T790M-EGFR inhibitors 1–3 and the recently described T790M-EGFR inhibitor PF-06459988 (Cheng et al, 2016) when tested at a concentration of 100 nM (below the IC 50 values of third-generation inhibitors for WT-EGFR) (Figure S3D). Additional protein targets beyond L858R/T790M-EGFR were identified for inhibitors 1 and 3 , which, for instance, blocked corresponding probe 4 and 6 labeling of 22 kDa (marked <1 and <1,3; Figure 1C) and 50 kDa (marked <3; Figure 1C) proteins, respectively, in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure S3E).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This competition profile contrasted with that observed for WT-EGFR, as measured in A431 cells, where probe labeling of a 170 kDa protein (in this case, using probe 7 that targets WT-EGFR (Lanning et al, 2014)) was competed by second-generation inhibitors such as afatinib, but less substantially by the third-generation T790M-EGFR inhibitors 1–3 and the recently described T790M-EGFR inhibitor PF-06459988 (Cheng et al, 2016) when tested at a concentration of 100 nM (below the IC 50 values of third-generation inhibitors for WT-EGFR) (Figure S3D). Additional protein targets beyond L858R/T790M-EGFR were identified for inhibitors 1 and 3 , which, for instance, blocked corresponding probe 4 and 6 labeling of 22 kDa (marked <1 and <1,3; Figure 1C) and 50 kDa (marked <3; Figure 1C) proteins, respectively, in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure S3E).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Analysis of probes and parent inhibitor pairs in Table S1 for inhibition of phosphorylated EGFR (pY1068) in H1975 cells and intrinsic reactivity in a conjugation assay with glutathione (GSH) were performed as described (Cheng et al, 2016). Briefly, the intrinsic chemical reactivity was accessed by evaluating the rate of electrophilic attack of the test compound to a strong nucleophile, glutathione (GSH), this was achieved by monitoring test compound loss during the reaction via LCMS/MS detection.…”
Section: Star Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The problem of Kruithof and Vegter's approach is that the triangles have completely no quality control and will be possibly distorted during the process of projecting. In 2004 and 2005, Cheng and Shi improved the triangulation quality of MSS by introducing the restricted Delaunay triangulation to the mesh representation [27, 28]. Instead of meshing sampled points on the skin surface and controlling the triangle quality by edge contraction and circumcenter insertion, they triangulate the sample points in 3 dimensions and take the surface triangle as the final mesh.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%