“…Further, reanalysis was performed by specifying the explicit presence of halogen: 79 th position interactions in the All_pose_structure file and the resultant targets were mapped on to the kinome tree Figure 5a. The known wild targets of sorafenib: ABL1 (Kurosu, Ohki, Wu, Kagechika, & Miura, 2009), p38a (Namboodiri et al., 2010), CDK8 (Schneider et al., 2011), MET (Beizaei et al., 2019), TRKB (Kumar et al., 2009), FLT3, FLT1 (Wilhelm et al., 2004), RIPK1 (Martens et al., 2017), DDR1 (El‐Damasy, Cho, Nam, Pae, & Keum, 2016; Kitagawa et al., 2013) and the mutant targets such as JNK2 (functional disability due to this mutation is not reported, hence was considered as wild type; Broecker‐Preuss et al., 2015), BRAF V600E (Wan et al., 2004), KDR T940V (Okamoto et al., 2015), KIT mutant and KIT WT (Wilhelm et al., 2004) were also identified as top‐ranking hits as per the maximal number of interaction patterns, and EphB4 Y774E_A803V_V870I (functional disability due to this mutation is not reported, hence was considered as wild type; Wang et al., 2017), PEK D937N (but wild PEK inhibition is reported [Shiota et al., 2010]), FMS C667T_C830S_C907T (functional disability due to this mutation is not reported, hence was considered as wild type; Uitdehaag et al., 2011; Ullrich et al., 2011) were identified to be mapped on the kinome tree Figure 5a & Table S5. The other targets of sorafenib: CDK2 (WT) and MELK mutant were also found during target prioritization.…”