1998
DOI: 10.1086/311381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of an Ultrafast X-Ray Pulsar in the Supernova Remnant N157B

Abstract: We present the serendipitous discovery of 16 ms pulsed X-ray emission from the Crab-like supernova remnant N157B in the Large Magellanic Cloud. This is the fastest spinning pulsar associated with a supernova remnant (SNR). Observations with the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE), centered on the field containing SN1987A, reveal an X-ray pulsar with a narrow pulse profile. Archival ASCA X-ray data confirm this detection and locate the pulsar within 1 ′ of the supernova remnant N157B, 14 ′ from SN1987A. The puls… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
190
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
15
190
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The periods for our models range between 0.08 and 0.13 ms. These are extremely short periods, not only much shorter than the observed periods of young pulsars, which are between 20 and 100 ms (Muslimov & Page 1996;Marshall et al 1998;Kaspi et al 1994), but even shorter than the critical velocity of NS, which is between 0.44 and 0.65 ms 7 Some additional braking mechanism is therefore needed to reconcile our predictions with observations (see below).…”
Section: Comparisons With Observationsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The periods for our models range between 0.08 and 0.13 ms. These are extremely short periods, not only much shorter than the observed periods of young pulsars, which are between 20 and 100 ms (Muslimov & Page 1996;Marshall et al 1998;Kaspi et al 1994), but even shorter than the critical velocity of NS, which is between 0.44 and 0.65 ms 7 Some additional braking mechanism is therefore needed to reconcile our predictions with observations (see below).…”
Section: Comparisons With Observationsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The central angular momentum is about an order of magnitude less than what would exist had angular momentum been conserved in the core all the way from a (rigidly rotating) mainsequence model with typical observed rotation speed (about 200 km s~1). However, the calculated presupernova angular momentum in the stellar core is still about 2 orders of magnitude greater than observed even in fast pulsars like the 16 ms pulsar in SNR N157B (Marshall et al 1998). Perhaps pulsars are slowed during or after the supernova explosion (Lindblom, Owen, & Morsink 1998 ;Owen et al 1999).…”
Section: Fig 1èangular Momentum ( J) Distribution In a 20mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The measured period derivativeṖ ≈ 5 × 10 −14 s s −1 (Marshall et al 1998;Cusumano et al 1998) implies a spin down age of ∼ 5 000 yrs and a rotational energy loss ofĖ ≈ 4.8 × 10 38 ergs s −1 , the highest among RPPs. As common of young pulsars, PSR J0537−6910 exhibts large glitches (Middleditch et al 2006) and features a compact pulsar-wind nebula (Townsley et al 2006).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 93%