2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of benzo[g]indoles as a novel class of non-covalent Keap1-Nrf2 protein-protein interaction inhibitor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…24,28 Compounds 1-11 all showed robust inhibition (Figure 2A) with Ki values correlating with literature ( Figure 1 vs. Table 1). 22,24,27,28,30,34,36,37,39 Only compounds 8 and 11 showed some deviations from the literature (Ki = 0.0021 µM vs. IC50 = 0.20 µM 38 and Ki = 2.8 µM vs. IC50 = 118 µM 33 , respectively). For compound 8, this difference can be explained by a high protein-to-probe concentration ratio in the reported FP assay (250 nM Keap1 to 10 nM probe) compared to our conditions (14 nM Keap1 to 3 nM probe); this is despite using the same peptide probe.…”
Section: Inhibition Activity In Competitive Fp Assaymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…24,28 Compounds 1-11 all showed robust inhibition (Figure 2A) with Ki values correlating with literature ( Figure 1 vs. Table 1). 22,24,27,28,30,34,36,37,39 Only compounds 8 and 11 showed some deviations from the literature (Ki = 0.0021 µM vs. IC50 = 0.20 µM 38 and Ki = 2.8 µM vs. IC50 = 118 µM 33 , respectively). For compound 8, this difference can be explained by a high protein-to-probe concentration ratio in the reported FP assay (250 nM Keap1 to 10 nM probe) compared to our conditions (14 nM Keap1 to 3 nM probe); this is despite using the same peptide probe.…”
Section: Inhibition Activity In Competitive Fp Assaymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…. 22,34,36,38,56 A key issue with these syntheses lies in the poor stability of the 1,4-diamino intermediates 30 and 33, which were observed to rapidly degrade, presumably through oxidation; this might explain the reproducibility issues in terms of yields, i.e. the previously reported yield for the synthesis of 4 (64%) could not be replicated here (13-23%), which also applies for compound 7 (overall yield of 15% vs. literature yield of 35%).…”
Section: Selection and Synthesis Of Known Small-molecule Keap1-nrf2 Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations