2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018tc005180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of Major Basement‐Cored Uplifts in the Northern Galiuro Mountains, Southeastern Arizona: Implications for Regional Laramide Deformation Style and Structural Evolution

Abstract: The Laramide orogeny is poorly understood in southeastern Arizona, largely because of complex structural overprinting by mid-Cenozoic extension that occurred over large areas. This study integrates new geological mapping with previous work, combined with structural reconstructions and forward modeling, to determine the primary structural style, timing, evolution, and kinematics of Laramide shortening in the northern Galiuro Mountains. Cenozoic normal faulting in the study area is minor and has only resulted in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(127 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). However, recent studies in highly extended locales have shown that previously identified thin-skinned thrusts are basement-cored uplifts with moderate-angle reverse faults Seedorff, 2017, 2020), which is consistent with the geology of nearby areas that have undergone minor extension (Davis, 1979;Favorito and Seedorff, 2018). This suggests that interpretations of thin-skinned thrusts elsewhere in the region (Fig.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…1). However, recent studies in highly extended locales have shown that previously identified thin-skinned thrusts are basement-cored uplifts with moderate-angle reverse faults Seedorff, 2017, 2020), which is consistent with the geology of nearby areas that have undergone minor extension (Davis, 1979;Favorito and Seedorff, 2018). This suggests that interpretations of thin-skinned thrusts elsewhere in the region (Fig.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The southern MCCs, of which the Coyote Mountains are a part, are unique compared to the northern ones in the fact that they are located within an area characterized by Laramide shortening of the craton (e.g., Coney, 1980; Coney & Harms, 1984; Spencer & Reynolds, 1990). The exact style of Laramide deformation as well as the timing and magnitude of shortening remains poorly constrained, owing to the subsequent widespread extensional tectonics, including both MCC and Basin and Range extension that overprinted most of these structures (see Favorito & Seedorff, 2018, and references therein). However, recent work examining the geochemistry of continental‐arc rocks by Chapman et al (2020) suggests that the crust of the southern U.S. Cordillera (western and southern AZ, northern Sonora) was 57 ± 12 km thick during the Laramide orogeny.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, the southern MCCs are in an area characterized by Laramide shortening. As a result, contractional structures are widespread (e.g., Favorito & Seedorff, 2018; Spencer et al, 2019) and include the Baboquivari thrust (Haxel et al, 1984; Wright & Haxel, 1982). Evidence for reactivation of an earlier structure is not present here (Davis et al, 1987; Gardulski, 1980; Haxel et al, 1984), and as far as we can tell, the microstructures of the Coyote Mountains detachment shear zone are entirely extensional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aptian-Albian marine limestone in southern Arizona suggests that the region was at or below sea level during mid-Cretaceous time (Dickinson and Lawton, 2001) and only transitioned to a contractional regime at the start of the Laramide orogeny (Chapman et al, 2018). Structural studies in the area indicate that deformation primarily occurred by folding or slip associated with high-angle reverse faults, which only accumulated a few to several tens of kilometers of horizontal shortening (Davis, 1979;Krantz et al, 1989;Clinkscales and Lawton, 2017;Favorito and Seedorff, 2018). Conversely, parts of the thin-skinned Sevier thrust belt in the central United States Cordillera accommodated ≥ 300 km of horizontal shortening (DeCelles and Coogan, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, subsequent research has demonstrated that many of the thrust faults used to support a thrust belt interpretation are lowangle normal faults or other types of geologic contacts such as unconformities (Dickinson, 1984;Krantz et al, 1989;Clinkscales and Lawton, 2017). As a result, most researchers now believe that the Sevier thrust belt terminates in the Mojave region of southern California (DeCelles, 2004;Yonkee and Weil, 2015) and that shortening in southern Arizona and northern Sonora was temporally restricted to the Laramide orogeny and predominantly occurred along high-angle reverse faults, in part reactivating Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous rift-related structures (Davis, 1979;Krantz et al, 1989;Lawton, 2000;Favorito and Seedorff, 2018;Fitz-Díaz et al, 2018).…”
Section: Geologic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%