2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12030354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrepancy Analysis for Detecting Candidate Parcels Requiring Update of Land Category in Cadastral Map Using Hyperspectral UAV Images: A Case Study in Jeonju, South Korea

Abstract: The non-spatial information of cadastral maps must be repeatedly updated to monitor recent changes in land property and to detect illegal land registrations by tax evaders. Since non-spatial information, such as land category, is usually updated by field-based surveys, it is time-consuming and only a limited area can be updated at a time. Although land categories can be updated by remote sensing techniques, the update is typically performed through manual analysis, namely through a visually interpreted compari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is only after knowledge (evidence) co-production processes, the finding of this study supports the view that we can bridge and close the gap between technical aspects of the EO data evidence generation and operational contexts in spatial decision making in land administration and management. Much of the available literature so far on remote sensing for land administration is too product-oriented for skilled and trained technicians [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and insufficiently process-oriented for policymakers and end-users, allowing them to make decisions in the most rational and informed way possible with EO data [22]. The point is not to go against the promising ideas on RS applications, techniques, products, and methods, but to really emphasize that it is an opportune time to undertake the most engaged and negotiated knowledge for both evidence generation and provision of salient and legitimate evidence in responsible and smart decision-making in land administration.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is only after knowledge (evidence) co-production processes, the finding of this study supports the view that we can bridge and close the gap between technical aspects of the EO data evidence generation and operational contexts in spatial decision making in land administration and management. Much of the available literature so far on remote sensing for land administration is too product-oriented for skilled and trained technicians [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and insufficiently process-oriented for policymakers and end-users, allowing them to make decisions in the most rational and informed way possible with EO data [22]. The point is not to go against the promising ideas on RS applications, techniques, products, and methods, but to really emphasize that it is an opportune time to undertake the most engaged and negotiated knowledge for both evidence generation and provision of salient and legitimate evidence in responsible and smart decision-making in land administration.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land administration deals with the people-to-land relationship, by describing, analyzing, designing, and measuring their relations that include social, economic, spatial, legal, and engineering perspectives [11]. Along with the growth of remote sensing applications in SES, there has been growing recognition and evidence of the vital links between remote sensing and land administration [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Geospatial data has emerged as powerful source of information for enabling both socio-technical assessment [20] and socio-legal analysis [21] in land administration sphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, inspired to deliver an alternative to ground-based surveying for the collection of non-boundary cadastral information, Park and Song [32] present a study aimed at remote identification of the discrepancy between existing cadastral maps (which include use information), and current on-ground land uses. The proposed method involves updating the existing land cover attributes of a land parcel maps using UAV hyperspectral imagery classified using CNN, and then composing a discrepancy map showing land use differences.…”
Section: Overview Of Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyperspectral UAV images of two sites in Jeonju City in South Korea were used for CD. The dataset was acquired from the previous study [41]. The temporal hyperspectral UAV images were acquired on September 19, 2019 (T 1 ), and October 16, 2019 (T 2 ), respectively.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%