2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-018-0073-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrepancy between simulated and observed ethane and propane levels explained by underestimated fossil emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
71
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
10
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that to achieve good agreement with airborne propane observations, we need to scale the NEI2011 inventory by a factor of 10. This large correction is consistent with recent work by Dalsøren et al (), who found that simulated propane was roughly 2–5 times too low near U.S. oil and gas sources even after increasing propane emissions by a factor of 3. Our final simulations use the scaled Turner et al () emissions globally, overwritten over the United States with NEI2011 emissions scaled by a factor of 10.…”
Section: Model Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We find that to achieve good agreement with airborne propane observations, we need to scale the NEI2011 inventory by a factor of 10. This large correction is consistent with recent work by Dalsøren et al (), who found that simulated propane was roughly 2–5 times too low near U.S. oil and gas sources even after increasing propane emissions by a factor of 3. Our final simulations use the scaled Turner et al () emissions globally, overwritten over the United States with NEI2011 emissions scaled by a factor of 10.…”
Section: Model Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Tzompa‐Sosa et al () showed that ethane distributions simulated using these emissions capture the seasonal and spatial distributions seen in surface and aircraft observations from around the world. RONO 2 sensitivity to recent changes in ethane emissions driven by oil and gas extraction (Dalsøren et al, ; Helmig et al, ; Helmig et al, ) is discussed in section .…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethane (C 2 H 6 ) is the second most abundant hydrocarbon in the atmosphere after CH 4 . Ethane has an average atmospheric lifetime of roughly 2 mo due to reaction with the hydroxyl radical and a global emission rate estimated at 12 Tg·y −1 to 20 Tg·y −1 (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Roughly two-thirds of global ethane emissions are related to human use of fossil fuel and biofuels (10).…”
Section: And References Therein)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study builds on Höglund-Isaksson (2012) by extending the timeframe from 2030 to 2050, updating statistics for historical years to 2015, reflecting recent findings from the literature, and including several methodological improvements of emission estimations, e.g., for the oil and gas sectors (Höglund-Isaksson 2017, Dalsøren et al 2018) and waste and wastewater sectors . The extended timeframes of this study, to 2015 for historical emissions and to 2050 for future projections, allow for two important insights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%