2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete choice models with q-product random utilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a violation of the standard Gumbel distribution assumption is found, alternative modelling approaches may be explored to overcome the ill-effects. Adopting an alternative parametric distribution for random utilities may prove to be a solution; for example, the Weibull or logistic distribution recently proposed in the literature[ 24 , 25 ] could serve as appropriate distributional assumptions on the random error term. In addition, a generalized multinomial logit model or a discrete-continuous choice model that allows heteroscedastic variance may also prove to be superior to the standard MNL and MDCEV model[ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a violation of the standard Gumbel distribution assumption is found, alternative modelling approaches may be explored to overcome the ill-effects. Adopting an alternative parametric distribution for random utilities may prove to be a solution; for example, the Weibull or logistic distribution recently proposed in the literature[ 24 , 25 ] could serve as appropriate distributional assumptions on the random error term. In addition, a generalized multinomial logit model or a discrete-continuous choice model that allows heteroscedastic variance may also prove to be superior to the standard MNL and MDCEV model[ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al 2015formulate a Hybrid closed-form route choice model to alleviate the contrasting scaling issues of MNL and MNW by simultaneously considering absolute cost difference and relative cost difference, and is extended to include a path size correction factor to capture the correlation between routes. Chikaraishi & Nakayama (2016) extend concepts from the q-Generalised Logit model (Nakayama & Chikaraishi, 2015) to introduce a q-Product Logit model in which the relationship between the deterministic and random components of utilities can be either additive, multiplicative, or inbetween, depending on the value of the parameter q, where MNL and MNW are special cases of the model. A q-Product Nested Logit model is presented to capture correlation, where the CNL model is a special case, as well as a nested equivalent of the Weibit model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, researchers have explored various departures from standard kernel error distributions (see Paleti, 2019, for a review). These advancements include negative exponential (Alptekinoglu and Semple, 2016), negative Weibull (Castillo et al, 2008), generalised exponential (Fosgerau and Bierlaire, 2009) and q-generalised reverse Gumbel (Chikaraishi and Nakayama, 2016) kernel error distributions, additive combinations of Gumbel and exponential error terms (Del Castillo, 2016), a class of asymmetric distributions (Brathwaite and Walker, 2018), copulas with Gumbel marginals (Del Castillo, 2020). However, these extensions do not aim at enhancing the robustness of choice models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%