2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-016-1690-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete derived categories I: homomorphisms, autoequivalences and t-structures

Abstract: Discrete derived categories were studied initially by Vossieck [42] and later by Bobiński, Geiß, Skowroński [9]. In this article, we describe the homomorphism hammocks and autoequivalences on these categories. We classify silting objects and bounded t-structures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
77
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following result is a corollary of the description of the bounded t-structures on D b (mod Λ) given in [15] and Proposition 5.5.…”
Section: ) the Object E Is A Silting Object If And Only If (U V) Ismentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following result is a corollary of the description of the bounded t-structures on D b (mod Λ) given in [15] and Proposition 5.5.…”
Section: ) the Object E Is A Silting Object If And Only If (U V) Ismentioning
confidence: 70%
“…It was shown in [15] that the class of derived discrete algebras (introduced in [53]) satisfies this property. We will give a short account in §5.2.…”
Section: ≥0mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the claim, we recall from [15, Theorem 2.1] and [4, Proposition 2.3] that A is either derived equivalent to the path algebra of a Dynkin quiver, or to the algebra A(r, N, m) given by the following quiver (1) Recall from [10,5] that the group of standard autoequivalences on D b (A-mod) is explicitly calculated, where A is a derived-discrete algebra of finite global dimension. Theorem 3.6 implies that this group coincides with the whole group of (triangle) autoequivalences on D b (A-mod).…”
Section: Consequently Any Derived Equivalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example A bounded t‐structure is algebraic provided that its heart has finitely many isomorphism classes of indecomposable objects. For example, all bounded t‐structures on sans-serifDnormalbfalse(sans-serifmod0.72229ptnormalΛfalse) are algebraic for the following finite‐dimensional K‐algebra normalΛ: (1)normalΛ is representation‐finite hereditary; (2)K is algebraically closed and normalΛ is a finite‐dimensional derived‐discrete K‐algebra of finite global dimension [, Proposition 7.1]. …”
Section: Silting Objects and T‐structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%