1995
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1995.167.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminants of involutions on Henselian division algebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can apply this result to S and to I to get that the types of σ and σ * are equal to the type of σ| C . Also, applying it to I = (C, G, (ω, f )), we see that the type of σ is equal to the type of σ| C , which is equal to the type of σ| C , by [3,§1,Prop. 3].…”
Section: Involutions On Inertially Split Division Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We can apply this result to S and to I to get that the types of σ and σ * are equal to the type of σ| C . Also, applying it to I = (C, G, (ω, f )), we see that the type of σ is equal to the type of σ| C , which is equal to the type of σ| C , by [3,§1,Prop. 3].…”
Section: Involutions On Inertially Split Division Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We thus extend Dherte's results to the context of inertially split algebras over a Henselian valued field with residue characteristic not 2. We remark that in [3,Thm. 5] it is proved that if D is a division algebra of exponent 2 over a Henselian valued field F (with char(F ) = 2) and if D has an involution σ of the first kind with σ = id on D, then D can be decomposed as D = S ⊗ F T with S inertially split and T totally ramified, and each of S and T are stable under σ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations