2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2018.8512681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminating Between Imagined Speech and Non-Speech Tasks Using EEG

Abstract: This is a repository copy of Discriminating between imagined speech and non-speech tasks using EEG.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This process can be carried on the time domain, frequency domain, and spatial domain. In the time domain, the feature extraction process is often done through statistical analysis, obtaining statistical features such as standard deviation (SD), root mean square (RMS), mean, variance, sum, maximum, minimum, Hjorth parameters, sample entropy, autoregressive (AR) coefficients, among others (Riaz et al, 2014 ; Iqbal et al, 2016 ; AlSaleh et al, 2018 ; Cooney et al, 2018 ; Paul et al, 2018 ; Lee et al, 2019 ). On the other hand, the most common methods used to extract features from the frequency domain include Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC), Short-Time Fourier transform (STFT), Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), Wavelet Transform (WT), Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), and Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) (Riaz et al, 2014 ; Salinas, 2017 ; Cooney et al, 2018 ; Garćıa-Salinas et al, 2018 ; Panachakel et al, 2019 ; Pan et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Feature Extraction Techniques In Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process can be carried on the time domain, frequency domain, and spatial domain. In the time domain, the feature extraction process is often done through statistical analysis, obtaining statistical features such as standard deviation (SD), root mean square (RMS), mean, variance, sum, maximum, minimum, Hjorth parameters, sample entropy, autoregressive (AR) coefficients, among others (Riaz et al, 2014 ; Iqbal et al, 2016 ; AlSaleh et al, 2018 ; Cooney et al, 2018 ; Paul et al, 2018 ; Lee et al, 2019 ). On the other hand, the most common methods used to extract features from the frequency domain include Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC), Short-Time Fourier transform (STFT), Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), Wavelet Transform (WT), Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), and Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) (Riaz et al, 2014 ; Salinas, 2017 ; Cooney et al, 2018 ; Garćıa-Salinas et al, 2018 ; Panachakel et al, 2019 ; Pan et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Feature Extraction Techniques In Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we focus on non-invasive brain signals acquired using EEG technique. Despite of the low spatial resolution of EEG, it has been widely popular owing to it's simplistic nature and little to no discomfort to the user [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recognition of imagined speech using EEG has been attempted at various levels such as word, syllable, vowel imagination [4]- [6]. In their work, Gonzalez-Castaneda et al [7] proposed an imagined word classification system using EEG comprising of 5 words.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many BCI researchers have proposed using electroencephalogram (EEG) signals as a preferred non-invasive method of inferring brain activity. Although they offer less depth and spatial resolution than other imaging methods, EEG systems are now portable and affordable and offer better temporal resolution than alternative approaches [4]. EEGbased studies of imagined speech recognition are emerging, broadly divided into word, syllable, and vowel imagination, however, they remain limited in the number and variety of imagined classes [4,5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although they offer less depth and spatial resolution than other imaging methods, EEG systems are now portable and affordable and offer better temporal resolution than alternative approaches [4]. EEGbased studies of imagined speech recognition are emerging, broadly divided into word, syllable, and vowel imagination, however, they remain limited in the number and variety of imagined classes [4,5,6]. For example, Gonzalez-Castaneda et al [7] proposed a five imagined word classification system using EEG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%