2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(01)02016-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination methods between neutron and gamma rays for boron loaded plastic scintillators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the low atomic number of boron, there is no gamma rays detection enhancement and the thermal cross section of B allows a moderate, yet efficient loading. Also, as the capture of the thermal neutron releases an alpha particle, pulse discrimination is therefore possible [15].…”
Section: Thermal Neutron Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the low atomic number of boron, there is no gamma rays detection enhancement and the thermal cross section of B allows a moderate, yet efficient loading. Also, as the capture of the thermal neutron releases an alpha particle, pulse discrimination is therefore possible [15].…”
Section: Thermal Neutron Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34] However, light collection using the scintillator bar/WLS fiber readout configuration is unlikely to work with pulse shape discrimination due to the low number of photons from an event actually reaching the MAPMT compared with the number of photons initially emitted in a scintillation event and the change in pulse shape from the readout fibers (the fibers re-emit shifted photons over a period of nanoseconds following initial photon absorption).…”
Section: B Pulse Height and Shape Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Different time gate methods (charge integration): In these methods, the pulse charge ratio is measured for short and long time gates, which are more efficient for fast and slow components, respectively [7] , [10]. 3) Digital filter methods: In these methods, each pulse shape is digitized and compared with two different standard pulse shapes, which are simulated beforehand for γ and α-rays [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%