Discrimination of Arabic-Named Applicants in the Netherlands: An Internet-Based Field Experiment Examining Different Phases in Online Recruitment Procedures

Abstract

his study examines discrimination of Arabic-named applicants in online recruitment procedures in the Netherlands. We develop and implement a new field experiment approach, posting fictitious résumés (n = 636) on two online résumé databases. Two phases of recruitment procedures are examined: employers' decisions to (1) view applicants' complete résumés after seeing short profiles and (2) contact applicants. The experiment covers both male and female applicants, three occupational levels, five sectors, and ten geographical regions, and consists of two waves. Results provide strong evidence of discrimination in the first phase (views). Résumés of Arabic-named applicants were requested less often, regardless of their education, gender, age, region, or sector, and for both websites and waves. Controlling for the number of times candidates' full résumés were viewed, there is less evidence of discrimination in the second phase (reactions). Yet, after two phases, the cumulative ethnic difference is considerable: Dutch-named applicants are 60 percent more likely to receive a positive reaction than Arabic-named applicants. We conclude that ethnic disparities in outcomes of recruitment procedures are substantial and arise already in the very first phase of the selection process. Hence, employers often do not even get to see Arabic-named applicants' résumés. Finally, discrimination is stronger in wave two, when the total number of views of résumés was lower, indicating lower labor demand.

Ethnic Discrimination in Hiring Decisions: A Meta-Analysis of Correspondence Tests 1990-2015

“…It is argued that members of ethnic minority groups on average are less educated, are unfamiliar with host-country institutions, are not fluent in the language, or lack the networks which might help them in their search for employment. However, differences in economic outcomes also persist when human capital differences are controlled for (Blommaert, Coenders, and van Tubergen 2014).…”

Status Characteristics and the Provision of Public Goods: Experimental Evidence

“…Hellerstein, Neumark, and Troske 1999;Hall and Farkas 2008), and discrimination of members of ethnic minorities (cf. Pager, Bonikowski, and Western 2009;Blommaert, Coenders, and van Tubergen 2013;Bursell 2014) as well as the gender pay gap (cf. Aisenbrey and Brückner 2008;Auspurg, Hinz, and Sauer 2017) are realities on labor markets.…”

Can Religious Affiliation Explain the Disadvantage of Muslim Women in the British Labour Market?

“…All but two coefficients are statistically insignificant; for second generation Indian-Muslims and White-Other Muslim women. This does not automatically suggest that Muslim women are less likely to be economically active than White-British Christian due to discrimination, although this is a viable possibility given the strong evidence of discrimination based on names (Andriessen et al, 2012;Bertrand and Mullainathan, 2004;Blommaert, Coenders and Van Tubergen, 2014;Budhwar et al, 2010).…”