2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminative spatial-frequency-temporal feature extraction and classification of motor imagery EEG: An sparse regression and Weighted Naïve Bayesian Classifier-based approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These channels are around the sensorimotor cortex, providing a better signal-to-noise ratio than the other channels, and are thus more important in decoding MI tasks [10,35]. The results are compared with those obtained by using other feature extraction methods based on all 60 channels [34,[36][37][38][39][40][41], as well as using BP features extracted from the broad band (8-30 Hz) and full length (from the start to the end of motor imagery) EEG signals at the same three Laplacian channels. Furthermore, we also test our method with different amounts of artifacts contaminated trials to evaluate its robustness to artifacts.…”
Section: Subjectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These channels are around the sensorimotor cortex, providing a better signal-to-noise ratio than the other channels, and are thus more important in decoding MI tasks [10,35]. The results are compared with those obtained by using other feature extraction methods based on all 60 channels [34,[36][37][38][39][40][41], as well as using BP features extracted from the broad band (8-30 Hz) and full length (from the start to the end of motor imagery) EEG signals at the same three Laplacian channels. Furthermore, we also test our method with different amounts of artifacts contaminated trials to evaluate its robustness to artifacts.…”
Section: Subjectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we compared our method with the methods that were proposed in the last five years from 2012 to 2016, including sparse time-frequency segment CSP (STFSCSP) [39], KullbackLeibler (KL) divergence based CSP (KL-CSP) [38], KL divergence based local temporal common spatial patterns (KL-LTCSP) [38], discrete cosine transform (DCT) [40] and linear prediction singular value decomposition (LP-SVD) [40,41,51]. Since all these recent works used 10-fold cross-validation to test their methods, we provide our results in 10-fold cross-validation as well to compare with them in Table 3.…”
Section: Improving Classification Performance Based On Few Eeg Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In BCI competition III dataset IV-a, all subjects (sub-dataset) has 280 trials. Although every subject consisted different train and test sets, they were combined into one dataset due to the low number of trials as used by some prior research [6], [18], [19]. This evaluation calculated after voting scheme is conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another promising study introduced by [18]. They improve CSP with sparse time-frequency segment common spatial pattern (STFSCSP) combined with Discernibility of Feature Sets (DFS) criteria that dedicated for spatial filter optimization and Weighted Naïve Bayesian Classifier (WNBC).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation