Discussion of “Temperature Distributions in Composite Bridges”

Cundy, Vic A.; Pell, Kynric M; Nydahl, J. E.

doi:10.1061/jsdeag.0005085

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1D, 2D, and 3D finite element models (FEMs) can be adopted based on different assumptions. 1D FEMs assume that temperature only varies along a single direction of the cross-section, e.g., the vertical direction of the girder (Emerson, 1973; Cundy et al, 1979). 2D FEMs ignore the longitudinal temperature variation of bridge components.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Temperature behavior of cable-stayed bridges. Part I — Global 3D temperature distribution by integrating heat-transfer analysis and field monitoring data

Shan

Xia

et al. 2023

Advances in Structural Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Varying temperatures significantly affect long-span cable-stayed bridges. However, quantitative studies on their temperature behaviors are limited. Existing studies focus on 2D or 3D models of bridge segments only, exclude cables from heat-transfer analysis, and utilize inaccurate environmental conditions. For the first time, this study comprehensively and accurately investigates the global 3D temperature distribution of long-span cable-stayed bridges by integrating the heat-transfer analysis and field monitoring data. A navigation channel bridge of the Hong Kong‒Zhuhai‒Macao Bridge is used as the testbed. A global 3D refined finite element model of the entire bridge is established. The external thermal boundary conditions of the outer surfaces of the structure are carefully determined based on the real-time ambient temperature, wind, and solar radiation, which are tailored for each surface to reflect the influence of the geometric configuration. The internal thermal boundary conditions of the inner surfaces of the box girder and tower are dependent on the measured ambient temperature, considering the vertical temperature difference of the girder and the uniform temperature inside the tower. Then, the numerical heat-transfer analysis and field monitoring data are integrated to calculate the detailed temperature distribution of the entire bridge in different seasons. Results show that ambient temperature, wind, and solar radiation significantly affect the temperature distribution. For the girder, the vertical temperature difference is significant throughout the year, and the transverse temperature difference is nonnegligible in winter and summer, while the longitudinal temperature difference is trivial. The internal temperature of the tower remains stable owing to the insulation of the concrete. The temperatures of the cables vary from each other, which may cause stress redistribution within the structure. The calculated temperatures are in good agreement with their measured counterparts. The temperature results will be used to calculate the thermal-induced responses in the companion paper in a unified manner.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%