Disengaged or raising voices? An analysis of the relationship between individual risk perception and non-institutionalised political participation

Abstract

The economic crisis of 2008 resulted in rising levels of unemployment, which were accompanied by protests in many countries. This led to a scientific debate on the influence of grievances on political participation. Previous studies have shown that individual affectedness leads to ‘exiting’, whereas in times of crisis grievances lead to increased political participation. What all these studies have in common is that they solely investigate actual deprivation. The present study adds a new aspect and examines if the individual risk perception of becoming deprived influences political participation. Does the individual risk perception of becoming deprived influence political participation and, if so, does this depend on the economic context? Based on grievance theory and using data from the European Social Survey and the World Bank, this study shows that the personal risk of becoming deprived increases the likelihood of participation. However, the participation-enhancing effect of one’s own risk perception is diminished when individuals live in an economically weak country and thus see no chance of improvement. This underlines that context plays a role and that economically deteriorating situations in the country can reduce participation rates.

Keep the (social) distance! Turnout and risk perception during health crisis

“…We assume that emotions based on fear motivate us to distance ourselves from dangerous situations, convincing us that exposure increases the risk (Weber, 2016). In the current literature, the perception of risks related to economic crises received large attention (Weiss, 2024), but there is limited analysis of health-related risk perception's effect on citizens' electoral participation as a factor contributing to turnout decline in new-wave democracies (Picchio and Santolini, 2022;Voda and Vodová, 2023). To approach this, the article makes use of a cross-sectional analysis and a case study focusing on the parliamentary elections held in Romania in December 2020, in the middle of the second wave of the coronavirus pandemic.…”