Disentangling and quantifying contributions of distinct forcing factors to the observed global sea level pressure field

Abstract

Variations of the global sea level pressure (SLP) field reflect atmospheric and oceanic influences and have a profound influence on temperature, precipitation and the global carbon cycle. The impact of various forcing factors on this field was investigated mainly based on numerical simulations. Alternatively, here we identify and quantify the influences of various forcing factors on observational, reanalysis and simulated SLP fields. By applying canonical correlation analysis (CCA) on the aforementioned data sets, we separated and quantified the impact of increase CO 2 concentration, El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), Arctic Oscillation (AO) and solar forcing on the global SLP field, based on their associations with known footprints on the sea surface temperature (SST). Together, their corresponding SLP spatial structures explain ~ 60% of the observed variance. Whereas the atmospheric CO 2 concentration has the most prominent impact on the global SLP field, explaining 28% of variance, ENSO and AO account for 9% each. The solar forcing and AMO explain 7%, respectively 6% of global SLP variance. Similar spatial structures corresponding to the same forcing factors are identified based on the reanalysis SLP data. CCA applied on simulated SLP fields derived from six CMIP5 model simulations captures only the spatial structures of atmospheric CO 2 concentration, ENSO, AAO and AO. Such a decomposition of the global pressure field based on a linear combination of coupled SST-SLP pairs provide a reference against which one could validate the performance of general circulation models in simulating the lower atmosphere dynamics. KeywordsSea level pressure • Ocean temperature • CO 2 • Internal modes of variability • Solar influence Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (

Large-scale sea ice–Surface temperature variability linked to Atlantic meridional overturning circulation

“…If one assumes that distinct forcing factors are characterized by different temporal evolutions, then CCA can be used to separate the footprint of forcing factors on a given field. CCA has been previously used to identify and link coupled SST–sea level pressure [ 70 ], coupled SST–global high cloud cover patterns [ 71 , 72 ] or coupled SST–Drought Severity Index [ 73 ] patterns to a specific forcing.…”

Hotspots for warm and dry summers in Romania

“…The computation of SPEI is based on the probability distribution of the difference between PP and PET (PP-PET), and the data are normalized into a log-logistic probability distribu-tion. The potential evapotranspiration data were computed by employing the Penman-Monteith equation (Vanderlinden et al, 2008). The advantage of using SPEI is that it is standardized on a given period and a predefined distribution.…”

“…Several studies have suggested that due to global warming the large-scale atmospheric circulation has been altered both regionally and globally (Horton et al, 2015;Vaideanu et al, 2020). Any perturbance in the large-scale atmospheric circulation will also lead to changes in the hydroclimate, due to the fact that the atmospheric circulation plays a crucial role in the global and regional hydroclimatic variability (Ionita et al, 2020;Kingston et al, 2006Kingston et al, , 2015Schubert et al, 2016).…”

Triskeles and Symmetries of Mean Global Sea-Level Pressure

“…Most authors who have studied the space-time evolution of convection cells call upon the analysis in terms of components of sea-level pressure (SLP). SLP is directly related to climate indices (e.g., [35,57]). Decomposition methods often use "Empirical Orthogonal Functions" (EOF).…”