2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab86a2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling Dust Components in SN 2010jl: The First 1400 Days

Abstract: The luminous Type IIn SN 2010jl shows strong signs of interaction between the SN ejecta and dense circumstellar material. Dust may be present in the unshocked ejecta; the cool, dense shell (CDS) between the shocks in the interaction region; or in the circumstellar medium (CSM). We present and model new optical and infrared photometry and spectroscopy of SN 2010jl from 82 to 1367 days since explosion. We evaluate the photometric and spectroscopic evolution using the radiative transfer codes MOCASSIN and DAMOCLE… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While SN 2010jl exhibits near-IR and mid-IR rebrightening and a quite long plateau after ∼400 days, it is preceded by an X-ray/Hα peak somewhere between 200 and 300 days. As previously noted (e.g., Fransson et al 2014;Gall et al 2014;Sarangi et al 2018;Bevan et al 2020), an IR excess before ∼400 days may be the consequence of heating of pre-existing dust, while mid-IR flux at a later time may originate either from new dust in the CDS and/or the ejecta or from CSM dust. Sarangi et al (2018) presented a comparative analysis of mid-IR and X-ray LCs, and we complete that comparison here with the addition of an Hα LC (adopted from Fransson et al 2014).…”
Section: A Comprehensive Multiwavelength Overview Of Lcs Of Interacting Snementioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While SN 2010jl exhibits near-IR and mid-IR rebrightening and a quite long plateau after ∼400 days, it is preceded by an X-ray/Hα peak somewhere between 200 and 300 days. As previously noted (e.g., Fransson et al 2014;Gall et al 2014;Sarangi et al 2018;Bevan et al 2020), an IR excess before ∼400 days may be the consequence of heating of pre-existing dust, while mid-IR flux at a later time may originate either from new dust in the CDS and/or the ejecta or from CSM dust. Sarangi et al (2018) presented a comparative analysis of mid-IR and X-ray LCs, and we complete that comparison here with the addition of an Hα LC (adopted from Fransson et al 2014).…”
Section: A Comprehensive Multiwavelength Overview Of Lcs Of Interacting Snementioning
confidence: 53%
“…In the first few hundreds of days after explosion, when hot (T  1000 K) components of gas and dust tend to dominate the ejecta and/or its environment, the IRAC measurements probe the peak of the dust blackbody emission and provide the best constraints on the physical parameters. Such measurements have been illustrated with several SNe II-P (see, e.g., Sugerman et al 2006;Meikle et al 2007;Kotak et al 2009;Andrews et al 2010Andrews et al , 2011bSzalai et al 2011;Szalai & Vinkó 2013) and several interacting SNe (SN 2005ip-Fox et al 2010Stritzinger et al 2012;SN 2006jd-Stritzinger et al 2012SN 2010jl-Andrews et al 2011aFransson et al 2014;Sarangi et al 2018;Bevan et al 2020;SN 2013L-Andrews et al 2017Taddia et al 2020;SN 2014C-Tinyanont et al 2019bSN 2015da-Tartaglia et al 2020.…”
Section: Mid-ir Color Curves and Dust Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Smith et al (2016b) find that such long-lived emission from SNe IIn requires mass-loss episodes from the SN progenitor to occur for 1000 yr preceding the explosion. Some SNe IIn also show signs of pre-existing dust in the CSM shell revealed through infrared (IR) observations (e.g., SN 2010jl, Bevan et al 2020;SN 2014ab, Moriya et al 2020SN 2017hcc, Smith & Andrews 2020. Other transients show CSM interaction for a brief period, perhaps indicating a more confined CSM (e.g., SN 2008fq, Taddia et al 2013SN 2018zd, Zhang et al 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researches interpret the IR excess as the evidence of newly-formed dust (Smith et al 2012;Maeda et al 2013;Gall et al 2014), while others suggest a pre-existing and unshocked CSM dust grains (Andrews et al 2011;Fox et al 2013;Fransson et al 2014). Moreover, Bevan et al (2020) and Chugai (2018) propose that SN 2010jl presents both evidence of pre-existing dust in CSM and newly-formed dust in cold dense shell and/or ejecta. Gall et al (2014) derived the extinction curves of SN 2010jl from the attenuation of emission lines, and found rapid (in 40 -240 days) dust formation and inferred the presence of very large (> 1 micron) grains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%