2004
DOI: 10.1375/twin.7.2.162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling Genetic, Environmental, and Rater Effects on Internalizing and Externalizing Problem Behavior in 10-year-old Twins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
35
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two factors could have given rise to this. First, as noted by those authors, shared environmental effects could represent a bias on the part of the rater, as has been shown for other behavioral problems rated by parents (Bartels et al 2004;Neale and Stevenson 1989); why this effect might be larger in the Dutch study that in our study is not known. Second, there could have been heterogeneity between the two samples for such shared environmental influences as neighborhood SES or co-parent violence (Beyers et al 2001;Farver et al 2005;Tremblay et al 2004), risk factors related to aggressive behavior during the ages examined here.…”
Section: Developmental Genetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Two factors could have given rise to this. First, as noted by those authors, shared environmental effects could represent a bias on the part of the rater, as has been shown for other behavioral problems rated by parents (Bartels et al 2004;Neale and Stevenson 1989); why this effect might be larger in the Dutch study that in our study is not known. Second, there could have been heterogeneity between the two samples for such shared environmental influences as neighborhood SES or co-parent violence (Beyers et al 2001;Farver et al 2005;Tremblay et al 2004), risk factors related to aggressive behavior during the ages examined here.…”
Section: Developmental Genetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Second, we observed that shared environmental influences were moderate for the parent‐report‐based p factor, but negligible for self‐ and teacher‐rated p, respectively. This pattern of results is most likely due to rater bias in that parent ratings are based on a single informant rating both twins, whereas for teacher and self‐ratings different informants rate each twin (Bartels et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher estimates of shared environmental effects in parent-reported data might be due to shared rater effects (Bartels et al 2004). We found similar moderate estimate of genetic influences on parent-report compared to self-report, which was consistent with previous studies with multiple informants (Happonen et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%