Disentangling group specific QTL allele effects from genetic background epistasis using admixed individuals in GWAS: An application to maize flowering

Abstract

When handling a structured population in association mapping, group-specific allele effects may be observed at quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for several reasons: (i) a different linkage disequilibrium (LD) between SNPs and QTLs across groups, (ii) group-specific genetic mutations in QTL regions, and/or (iii) epistatic interactions between QTLs and other loci that have differentiated allele frequencies between groups. We present here a new genomewide association (GWAS) approach to identify QTLs exhibiting such group-specific allele effects. We developed genetic materials including admixed progeny from different genetic groups with known genome-wide ancestries (local admixture). A dedicated statistical methodology was developed to analyze pure and admixed individuals jointly, allowing one to disentangle the factors causing the heterogeneity of allele effects across groups. This approach was applied to maize by developing an inbred "Flint-Dent" panel including admixed individuals that was evaluated for flowering time. Several associations were detected revealing a wide range of configurations of allele effects, both at known flowering QTLs (Vgt1, Vgt2 and Vgt3) and new loci. We found several QTLs whose effect depended on the group ancestry of alleles while others interacted with the genetic background. Our GWAS approach provides useful information on the stability of QTL effects across genetic groups and can be applied to a wide range of species. Author summaryIdentification of genomic regions involved in genetic architecture of traits has become commonplace in quantitative genetics studies. Genetic structure is a common feature in human, animal and plant species and most current methods target genomic regions whose effects on traits are conserved between genetic groups. However, a heterogeneity of allele effects may be observed due to different factors: a group-specific correlation between PLOS GENETICS PLOS Genetics | https://doi.org/10.the alleles of the tagged marker and those of the causal variant, a group-specific mutation at the causal variant or an epistatic interaction between the causal variant and the genetic background. We propose a new method adapted to structured populations including admixed individuals, which aims to identify these genomic regions and to unravel the previous factors. The method was applied to a maize inbred diversity panel including lines from the dent and the flint genetic groups, as well as admixed lines, evaluated for flowering time. Several genomic regions were detected with various configurations of allele effects, with evidence of epistatic interactions between some of the loci and the genetic background. PLOS GENETICSDisentangling group specific QTL allele effects from genetic background epistasis in GWAS PLOS Genetics | https://doi.org/10.

Haplotype-Based, Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Stable Genomic Regions for Grain Yield in CIMMYT Spring Bread Wheat

“…The most important reason is that it is time consuming and computationally exhaustive to estimate genome-wide interactions in large datasets. Further, unlike in bi-parental populations, ready-touse models are not available to estimate marker interaction effects along with main additive effects in GWAS panels (Rio et al, 2020). Additionally, the lack of sufficiently large experimental datasets has been a limiting factor to obtain reasonable statistical power when screening the genome for multi-locus epistasis.…”

Transcriptome analysis of leafy near‐isogenic lines provides molecular insights into floral transition in maize (Zea mays)

“…This switch is a complex regulatory process that is controlled by multiple genes (Bluemel et al., 2015). Although a few genes had been revealed by comparative genomics, mutant analysis and QTL cloning in maize (Bluemel et al., 2015; Castelletti et al., 2014; Dong et al., 2012; Liang et al., 2019; Rio et al., 2020; Salvi et al., 2007, 2011), more genes are still required to elucidate the regulatory mechanism of floral transition in this important cereal crop. Lfy1 is a typical late‐flowering mutant in maize, which provides a novel material for investigating the biological process.…”

“…In maize, floral transition depends on the growth termination of the leaf primordia and the growth initiation of the tassel primordium (Colasanti & Muszynski, 2009). A conceptual genetic regulatory network model together with some important regulator genes has been proposed based on research results from mutant analysis, QTL cloning and comparative genomics analysis between maize and Arabidopsis (Bluemel et al., 2015; Castelletti, Tuberosa, Pindo, & Salvi, 2014; Dong et al., 2012; Liang et al., 2019; Rio et al., 2020; Salvi et al., 2007, 2011). The previously identified maize regulatory genes included a zinc finger protein coding gene, ID1, which functions through the autonomous pathway to regulate flowering time (Kozaki, Hake, & Colasanti, 2004), and three CCT domain genes, ZmCCT9 , ZmCCT10 and ZmCOL3, which play important roles in the photoperiod and circadian clock pathway (Huang et al., 2018; Hung et al., 2012; Jin et al., 2018; Stephenson et al., 2019).…”

Whole-genome sequencing of African Americans implicates differential genetic architecture in inflammatory bowel disease

“…Despite limited statistical evidence of association at many of the known loci as a result of the size of our African American cohort, we noted a strong concordance in the direction of effects (73%, p ¼ 2.05 3 10 À12 for inflammatory bowel disease; 69%, p ¼ 1. 26 is, to a great extent, shared across divergent populations (Figure 3). Despite strong effect-size correlations, subtle differences in allele frequency or the magnitude of effects at the established disease loci may reveal differential genetic architectures underlying inflammatory bowel disease between the two populations.…”