2018
DOI: 10.1111/1475-679x.12206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling Managers’ and Analysts’ Non‐GAAP Reporting

Abstract: Researchers frequently proxy for managers’ non‐GAAP disclosures using performance metrics available through analyst forecast data providers (FDPs), such as I/B/E/S. The extent to which FDP‐provided earnings are a valid proxy for managers’ non‐GAAP reporting, however, has been debated extensively. We explore this important question by creating the first large‐sample data set of managers’ non‐GAAP earnings disclosures, which we directly compare to I/B/E/S data. Although we find a substantial overlap between the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
248
1
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(268 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
14
248
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In panel B, non‐GAAP profit firms are from the data set shared by Bentley et al. [] (BCGW) for observations with nonnegative income before extraordinary items and operating earnings. The BCGW data are available through https://sites.google.com/view/kurthgee/data.…”
Section: Main Tests and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In panel B, non‐GAAP profit firms are from the data set shared by Bentley et al. [] (BCGW) for observations with nonnegative income before extraordinary items and operating earnings. The BCGW data are available through https://sites.google.com/view/kurthgee/data.…”
Section: Main Tests and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… The independent variable NG is simply a proxy for the disclosure of street earnings used extensively in prior research (e.g., Kolev et al ) and is not identical to the hand‐collected non‐GAAP earnings disclosure variable, PR , described later, and used in other research (e.g., Black et al ). Additionally, Bentley et al () had identified the frequency at which the proxies used in prior literature likely diverge from the actual management disclosures. As the content of earnings announcements is not the primary focus of this study, I rely on the proxy most widely used in the published literature. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managers, analysts, and FDPs have wide discretion in determining which earnings components to include/exclude in street earnings calculations. As a result, a number of prior studies have examined managers' and analysts' non-GAAP discretion and reporting incentives (e.g., Christensen et al, 2011;Barth et al, 2012;Doyle et al, 2013;Bentley et al, 2018). In addition, there is a large literature analyzing market reactions to GAAP and non-GAAP earnings surprises (e.g., Bradshaw and Sloan, 2002;Brown and Sivakumar, 2003;Bhattacharya et al, 2007).…”
Section: Street Earnings and The Role Of Fdps In Prior Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%