2019
DOI: 10.1101/530287
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling strictly self-serving mutations from win-win mutations in a mutualistic microbial community

Abstract: Mutualisms can be promoted by pleiotropic win-win mutations which directly benefit self (selfserving) and partner (partner-serving). Intuitively, partner-serving phenotype could be quantified as an individual's benefit supply rate to partners. Here, we demonstrate the inadequacy of this thinking, and propose an alternative. Specifically, we evolved well-mixed mutualistic communities where two engineered yeast strains exchanged essential metabolites lysine and hypoxanthine. Among cells that consumed lysine and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, there is a probable fitness cost for producers associated with increased nutrient excretion in well-mixed environments. Under well-mixed conditions, costless self-serving and mutually beneficial mutations, but not costly partner-serving mutations, are favored to evolve (34). Therefore mutations that improve a recipient’s ability to acquire key nutrients from producers, and thereby outcompete other recipient genotypes, can evolve rapidly (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there is a probable fitness cost for producers associated with increased nutrient excretion in well-mixed environments. Under well-mixed conditions, costless self-serving and mutually beneficial mutations, but not costly partner-serving mutations, are favored to evolve (34). Therefore mutations that improve a recipient’s ability to acquire key nutrients from producers, and thereby outcompete other recipient genotypes, can evolve rapidly (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coculture evolution was described in an earlier study 12 . To revive a coculture, ~20 µL was scooped from the frozen sample using a sterile metal spatula, diluted ~10-fold into SD, and allowed to grow to moderate turbidity for 1-2 days.…”
Section: Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%