2020
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling the effects of environment and ontogeny on tree functional dimensions for congeneric species in tropical forests

Abstract: Summary Soil water and nutrient availability are key drivers of tree species distribution and forest ecosystem functioning, with strong species differences in water and nutrient use. Despite growing evidence for intraspecific trait differences, it remains unclear under which circumstances the effects of environmental gradients trump those of ontogeny and taxonomy on important functional dimensions related to resource use, particularly in tropical forests. Here, we explore how physiological, chemical, and mor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(78 reference statements)
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher similarity in the floristic composition between TF and SF could be explained by relatively rare flooding events and the substantial overlap of environmental conditions across these two habitats, allowing many TF species to establish on soils that are not constantly water saturated, and conversely enabling many swamp species to be competitive on soils with stronger drainage. Species distributed on TF and SF soils may also exhibit greater plasticity than WS species, which allocate costly adaptation mechanisms to survive on these relatively extreme habitats (Fortunel et al 2020).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher similarity in the floristic composition between TF and SF could be explained by relatively rare flooding events and the substantial overlap of environmental conditions across these two habitats, allowing many TF species to establish on soils that are not constantly water saturated, and conversely enabling many swamp species to be competitive on soils with stronger drainage. Species distributed on TF and SF soils may also exhibit greater plasticity than WS species, which allocate costly adaptation mechanisms to survive on these relatively extreme habitats (Fortunel et al 2020).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such differences in leaf longevity are likely to have an important effect on the impact of herbivory on the carbon and nitrogen cycles. Variation between understorey and canopy herbivory can also be affected by ontogenetic differences in leaf traits (Damián et al, 2018) mature leaves in younger individuals can be more palatable than mature leaves in older individuals of the same species, as the former tend to be less thick and tough than the latter, hence making it easier for herbivore attack (Fortunel et al, 2020). Thus, our static sampling approach may be an underestimate of the actual levels of herbivory in disturbed forests.…”
Section: Understanding Variation In Rates Of Herbivorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed variability in leaf traits between sapling and adult stages can be related to ontogeny, considering that seedlings and saplings still have low reserves to produce costly leaves, and to local habitat conditions – less severe than in the canopy and high investment in leaf structure would be not necessary (Fortunel et al . 2020). Under the environmental conditions of the Araucaria forests, canopy trees must be able to acclimatise to harsh conditions imposed by lower temperatures, higher radiation and frost events (Oliveira‐Filho & Fontes 2000), featuring leaves with low SLA and high LDMC values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunel et al . 2020). Seedlings and saplings have little carbohydrate reserves and often make only soft leaves (with high SLA and low LDMC) that are more susceptible to herbivores but more efficient in terms of growth rate, especially when associated with large leaf blade (Poorter et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%