2014
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling the effects of working memory, language, parental education, and non-verbal intelligence on children’s mathematical abilities

Abstract: It is assumed that children’s performance in mathematical abilities is influenced by several factors such as working memory (WM), verbal ability, intelligence, and socioeconomic status. The present study explored the contribution of those factors to mathematical performance taking a componential view of both WM and mathematics. We explored the existing relationship between different WM components (verbal and spatial) with tasks that make differential recruitment of the central executive, and simple and complex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study supports this idea through evidence that linguistic abilities affect both calculation and problem‐solving skills. The finding is in line with many earlier studies emphasizing the importance of linguistic skills for different math skill areas (Cowan et al ., ; Fuchs et al ., ; Pina et al ., ; Purpura & Ganley, ; Träff, ). Thus, knowledge of temporal, spatial, and numerical concepts (that were assessed in our linguistic test) is important not only for solving word problems but also for simple calculation tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our study supports this idea through evidence that linguistic abilities affect both calculation and problem‐solving skills. The finding is in line with many earlier studies emphasizing the importance of linguistic skills for different math skill areas (Cowan et al ., ; Fuchs et al ., ; Pina et al ., ; Purpura & Ganley, ; Träff, ). Thus, knowledge of temporal, spatial, and numerical concepts (that were assessed in our linguistic test) is important not only for solving word problems but also for simple calculation tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linguistic abilities contribute to almost every subdomain of early math skills even when the other cognitive abilities and previous math skills are controlled (Cowan et al ., ; Purpura & Ganley, ); however, the effects may vary depending on which linguistic abilities and math skills are examined. Findings indicate that linguistic abilities predict those math skills that require language use (i.e., number naming, word problems, quantitative concepts), but are not related to arithmetic in preschool or upper primary school (LeFevre et al ., ; Pina et al ., ). On the other hand, linguistic abilities might be an antecedent to calculation skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent research has attempted to incorporate indicators of nonverbal cognitive capacity and verbal working memory in CLD and monolingual children (Engel de Abreu et al 2013;Pina et al 2014). Pina et al (2014) explored how children's mathematical performance is affected by working memory and verbal language ability, general intelligence, and socioeconomic status. Their results revealed an association between verbal working memory and arithmetic ability, and also between parental educational level and the grasp of quantitative concepts.…”
Section: Issues Regarding the Assessment Of Learning And Behavioral Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, working memory deficits are associated with disorders in reading (e.g., López-Escribano, Elosúa de Juan, Gómez-Veiga, & García-Madruga, 2013;Wang & Gathercole, 2014), mathematics (e.g., Geary, Hoard, Byrd-Craven, & DeSoto, 2004;Santos et al, 2012;Pina, Fuentes, Castillo, & Diamantopoulou, 2014), language (e.g., Archibald & Gathercole, 2006;Bandini, Santos, & Souza, 2013;Holmes et al, 2015), and attention (e.g. Martinussen & Tannock, 2006;Holmes et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%