Disentangling trait, occasion-specific, and accumulated situational effects of psychological distress in adulthood: evidence from the 1958 and 1970 British birth cohorts

Abstract

Background The trajectories of psychological distress differ between individuals, but these differences can be difficult to understand because the measures contain both consistent and situational features; however, in longitudinal studies these sources of information can be disentangled. In addition to occasion-specific features, interindividual differences can be decomposed into two sources of information: trait and carry-over effects between neighboring occasions that are not related to the trait (i.e. accumulated situational effects). Methods To disentangle these three sources of variance throughout adulthood, the consistency (trait and accumulated situational effects) and occasion specificity of nine indicators of psychological distress from the Malaise Inventory were examined in two birth cohorts, the 1958 National Child Development Study (NCDS58), and the 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70). Results The scale was administered at ages 23, 33, 42, and 50 in NCDS58 (n = 7147), and at ages 26, 30, 34, and 42 in BCS70 (n = 6859). For each psychological symptom, more variance was consistent than occasion-specific. The majority of the consistency was due to trait variance as opposed to accumulated situational effects, indicating that an individual predisposed to be distressed at the beginning of the study remained more likely to be distressed over the whole period. Symptoms of rage were notably more consistent among males than females in both cohorts (78.1% and 81.3% variance explained by trait in NCDS58 and BCS70, respectively), and among females in the NCDS58 (69%). Conclusions Symptoms of psychological distress exhibited high stability throughout adulthood, especially among men, due mostly to interindividual trait differences.

Stability of symptoms of psychological distress: A 13‐year study using Australian national data

“…In other words, on average, items were more likely to change due to unique influences and independently of the other items than to change together due to common influences. The occasion specificity coefficients are comparable to those found by Struijs et al (2020), yet they are slightly smaller than those found by Scarpato et al (2020). The items with the highest occasion specificity were "so sad that nothing could cheer you up," "hopeless," and "worthless."…”

“…Scarpato et al. (2020) used data collected at multiple time points with unequal multiyear lags and found that consistency was higher than occasion specificity for several symptoms of stress (e.g., anger, depression, and tiredness). Thus, both the short‐term and long‐term studies suggest that symptoms of psychological distress are more trait‐like rather than state‐like, with common consistency coefficients above 50%.…”

Disentangling change across the time and true stability of employees’ resilience using latent state model

“…In addition, the results should be generalized with caution as we have modelled a 3-month period only. In general, even questions designed to assess momentaneous behavior such as ‘right now, how do you feel’, are theoretically capturing more state components and are not guaranteed to assess 100% state variance (see [ 41 ]). Therefore, this could be the case for both statements included in the CD-RISC and the RSA because of the way they are worded.…”

Analyzing Stability and Change in Dyadic Attachment: The Multi-Rater Latent State-Trait Model With Autoregressive Effects

“…An LST-AR model for three observed variables and four measurement occasions is depicted in Figure 1 . LST-AR models have already been used in other studies to separate trait, occasion-specific, and accumulated situational effects ( Scarpato et al, 2021 ).…”