2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00027-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disinfection procedures: their effect on the dimensional accuracy and surface quality of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and gypsum casts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
93
2
27

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
93
2
27
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that for a disinfecting solution to be effective it must produce consistently high kill levels on every impression and not just a high average that includes some low values [42]. The results of this study confirmed the aseptic environment under which the experiment was conducted and proved that both test Taylor et al [10] reported that brands of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material which showed the least penetration of disinfecting solution demonstrated superior surface reproduction. However, impression materials that do not absorb disinfecting solutions may not be adequately disinfected if micro-organisms become entrapped within the material when the impression is taken.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been suggested that for a disinfecting solution to be effective it must produce consistently high kill levels on every impression and not just a high average that includes some low values [42]. The results of this study confirmed the aseptic environment under which the experiment was conducted and proved that both test Taylor et al [10] reported that brands of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material which showed the least penetration of disinfecting solution demonstrated superior surface reproduction. However, impression materials that do not absorb disinfecting solutions may not be adequately disinfected if micro-organisms become entrapped within the material when the impression is taken.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 4 disinfection of dental impressions routinely used in dentistry include: sodium hypochlorite, glutaraldehyde, iodophor, and phenol [8][9][10]. However, not all impression materials are compatible with all types of disinfectant and the potential for disinfectants to modify the properties of the impression material (surface roughness, and dimensional stability) are a distinct possibility [11].…”
Section: Page 4 Of 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although antibacterial effects of irreversible impression materials have been investigated recently (5,16,(19)(20)(21)(22), no information is available in the literature related to antibacterial tests on polyether impression materials. In the present study, three different types of polyether impression materials were tested to determine their ability to inhibit the growth of E. faecalis, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and C. albicans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spraying with disinfectant is not advocated due to the inhalational risk. 5 Taylor et al 38 found both sodium hypochlorite and a disinfecting solution, Perform ® , were effective in the elimination of Staphylococcus aureus. Furthermore, it has been suggested that rinsing should also take place after disinfection to remove any residual disinfectant, which may affect the surface of the stone cast.…”
Section: Decontamination Of Appliances and Impressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%