1997
DOI: 10.1006/inco.1997.2630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disjunctive Stable Models: Unfounded Sets, Fixpoint Semantics, and Computation

Abstract: Disjunctive logic programs have become a powerful tool in knowledge representation and commonsense reasoning. This paper focuses on stable model semantics, currently the most widely acknowledged semantics for disjunctive logic programs. After presenting a new notion of unfounded sets for disjunctive logic programs, we provide two declarative characterizations of stable models in terms of unfounded sets. One shows that the set of stable models coincides with the family of unfounded-free models (i.e., a model is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
187
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
187
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the next theorem immediately follows from the characterization of unfounded sets in (Leone et al 1997). …”
Section: Definition 32 (Unfounded Sets)mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the next theorem immediately follows from the characterization of unfounded sets in (Leone et al 1997). …”
Section: Definition 32 (Unfounded Sets)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The presence of negation also complicates the proof that the rewritten program is query-equivalent to the original one. To demonstrate this result, we have exploited the characterization of stable models via unfounded sets of (Leone et al 1997), and generalized the equivalence proof of (Alviano et al 2009) to the case of programs with functions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We express the absence of an external support in an interpretation by adapting the concept of an unfounded set [10,11] to DL-programs.…”
Section: External Support and Unfounded Sets For Dl-programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ordinary programs, unfounded sets proved to be a fruitful approach [16], which later had been extended to programs with aggregates [11]: an interpretation is an FLP-answer set of some program, if and only if it is unfounded-free, i.e., is disjoint from every unfounded set. Thus to decide whether a candidate is an answer set, one can simply search for unfounded sets, rather than to explicitly construct the reduct and enumerate its models in search for a smaller one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%