DISKURSUS KERUKUNAN SOSIAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF MASYARAKAT KRISTEN DI INDONESIA: Rekonsiliasi Pasca Pemilu 2019

Abstract

After the 2019 National Election in Indonesia, which still left problems both essentialism and mechanism, this nation has been materially and immaterially drained. Later, the political elites who benefit the situation for their interest have been very annoying and disturbing. Therefore, the harmony among the religious people in Indonesia is triggered by differences in political views, even having to reduce religious narratives and diction which are then forced even if they are contrary to human values. As a result, the discourse of social harmony is initiated by the community figures through no-theme participation; it becomes a formula that must be immediately implemented in such way that the unity of the nation might be restored after having been torn apart by the different political view. The discourse of social harmony might be attached to the Christian perspective that offers a completely new idea in accordance to the context of the problems in Indonesia. Through the literacy method, the form of re-reading and rechecking the diction and the narration have been formulated and provided new meaning or discourse into the social harmony of the digital-era Indonesian people altogether. It might be concluded that holding no-theme participation with literacy skills mastery is important to conduct among the digital-era Indonesian people since the digital era itself might be considered as one of the contributing factors to the present problems (such as hoax, deception and hate speech) that have so widely spread that they start to erode the unity and the integrity of Indonesia.

Lack of Critical Approach in the Hate Speech Research as Ideological Practice in Indonesia

“…Some believe that recent polarization or divisions among Indonesian people have manifested themselves in hate speech, which cannot be separated from existing political contestations, including the political moments of the 2019 Presidential Election. Therefore, as an effort to prevent and/or reconcile between groups, Kawangung & Lele [24] saw the need to build a social harmony discourse initiated by community leaders. In this case, according to him, efforts to participate in building dialogue between groups are very urgent things to do.…”

Internalisasi Sila Persatuan Indonesia dalam Kehidupan Beragama: Sebuah Refleksi Teologi Kristen

“…45 hal itu perlu dibangun agar tetap hidup rukun, tenteram, dan damai sejahtera walaupun berbeda pandangan maupun berbeda SARA sekalipun. 46 Sebab partisipasi dalam pembangunan manusia yang bersemangat hidup berdam-pingan merupakan kewajiban, karena pada prinsipnya semua warga masyarakat berkewajiban untuk ikut serta memikul beban pembangunan dan mensukseskan jalannya pembangunan masyarakat disegala lini termasuk dalam membangun keutuhan bangsa dengan pengamalan Pancasila sila persatuan Indonesia disetiap lini kehidupan.…”

Menumbuhkan Sikap Kerukunan dalam Persepektif Iman Kristen Sebagai Upaya Deradikalisasi

“…Kerukunan yang menjadi tujuan bersama manusia sosial umat beragama terjalin dari hubungan sesama manusia sebagai pemeluk agama yang dilandasi dengan toleransi, yang bertujuan membawa kebersamaan saling pengertian, saling menghormati, saling menghargai dalam kesetaraan mengaplikasikan ajaran agamanya dan kerja sama dalam kehidupan masyarakat multikiltural serta berbangsa dan bernegara (Sumbulah & Nurjanah, 2013). Kerukunan juga merupakan suatu prilaku yang dilihat dari sikap atau sifat dari personal umat manusia untuk membiarkan kebebasan kepada orang lain serta memberikan kebenaran atas perbedaan tersebut sebagai pengakuan hak-hak asasi manusia yang mendasar (Kawangung & Lele, 2019). Kerukunan juga merupakan hidup saling menghormati, hidup berdampingan dan penuh toleran, terlebih hidup dalam perdamaian, saling membantu, ramah dan tidak radikal (Machali, 2013b).…”