2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.25.21254320
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disparities in SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among individuals presenting for care in central North Carolina over a six-month period

Abstract: Background Robust community-level SARS-CoV-2 prevalence estimates have been difficult to obtain in the American South and outside of major metropolitan areas. Furthermore, though some previous studies have investigated the association of demographic factors such as race with SARS-CoV-2 exposure risk, fewer have correlated exposure risk to surrogates for socioeconomic status such as health insurance coverage. Methods We used a highly specific serological assay utilizing the receptor binding domain of the SARS-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, this is the first study to show increased transmission in non-White US households. Though they experience similar case fatality rates, African American/Black and Hispanic populations in the United States experience disproportionately higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection [19][20][21]. These racial disparities are likely due to differences in healthcare access and exposure risk that are driven by systemic societal inequities rather than individual biological or behavioral characteristics [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first study to show increased transmission in non-White US households. Though they experience similar case fatality rates, African American/Black and Hispanic populations in the United States experience disproportionately higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection [19][20][21]. These racial disparities are likely due to differences in healthcare access and exposure risk that are driven by systemic societal inequities rather than individual biological or behavioral characteristics [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole blood ELISA titers of 1:20, 1:40, and 1:120 were compared to plasma-based ELISA OD readings using confirmed SARS-CoV-2 antibody negative and positive controls. The sensitivity and specificity of the 1:20 titer were previously obtained [18]. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the 1:40 and 1:120 titers (S1 Table ).…”
Section: Serological Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are over 200 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 globally, with the United States accounting for almost 18 % of these cases 1 . The U.S. prevalence and disparities of SARS-CoV-2 infection have been documented in different demographics and regional areas [2][3][4][5][6][7] . However, this statistic undercounts pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, both of whom can transmit SARS-CoV-2 8 ; hence, the number of people spreading SARS-CoV-2 at any given time is difficult to determine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%