In recent years cities across the Global North have experienced the rapid rise of 'pop-up' culture; a trend for creating temporary places in disused sites and buildings. Pop-up has been widely promoted within the creative industries as providing cheap and flexible access to space and is now a popular format for craft makers and sellers. In this chapter I propose that examining pop-up's intersections with the craft economy offers important insights into craft's impact in contemporary cities. I explore pop-up as a geography through which craft's logics of one-off, handmade production and flexible labour are transforming the urban fabric. I consider how craft's emphasis on the unique and the handmade is, through pop-up, infused into the materiality of the city and how its labour logics of flexibility also find spatiotemporal form in pop-up's own versatile urban landscape. The growing intersection of craft and pop-up cultures, begs a pertinent question: if craft's sensibilities are being advanced and extended in the city through pop-up, then what does the politics of this 'crafted' city look like? More specifically; in a contemporary condition characterized by widespread precarity (Gill & Pratt 2008), how does this extension of craft's logics reflect and shape assumptions about how cities should be lived, governed and reproduced? Pop-up culture's shared sensibility with craft is clearly discernible. Pop-up sites are customarily handmade by their organizers; re-used materials are employed to craft personalized temporary spaces that, like craft products, are celebrated as one-off, DIY creations. Pop-up is also tied up with the same economic shifts towards post-Fordist economies within which craft is implicated. It is, like craft, an arena where 'flexible' work patterns are normalized and glamorized (Deslandes 2013; Ferreri 2015; Graziano & Ferreri 2014). It is also rooted in the 'hipster' economy within which craft has been situated; a scene whose sensibilities include a return to domestic practices of 'making, cooking and growing' (Luckman 2015: 44) which can be partially understood in relation to the austerity aesthetics ensuing