2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-5371(03)00003-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersion in the economic return to schooling

Abstract: Abstract:We extend the standard human capital earnings function to include dispersion in the return to schooling by treating the return as a random coefficient. If the rapid expansion in participation in higher education has been brought about by dipping further into the ability distribution, we should observe a rise in the variance of returns. Alternatively, if the expansion has come about through relaxing credit constraints then we might expect to see an increase in both the mean and variance of returns. Our… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Relying on this study is attractive because Harmon et al estimate the mean of the return to education to be exactly at the value of our benchmark calibration (at 6.8 percent) such that we need no changes at all for the calibrated model. Other studies (referenced in Harmon et al, 2003) arrive at quantitatively similar estimates. A standard deviation of 4.2 is huge since it implies that, optimally, a part of the population should acquire no education at all (based on their low individual return) and another part should obtain only compulsory education.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Relying on this study is attractive because Harmon et al estimate the mean of the return to education to be exactly at the value of our benchmark calibration (at 6.8 percent) such that we need no changes at all for the calibrated model. Other studies (referenced in Harmon et al, 2003) arrive at quantitatively similar estimates. A standard deviation of 4.2 is huge since it implies that, optimally, a part of the population should acquire no education at all (based on their low individual return) and another part should obtain only compulsory education.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Harmon et al (2003), for example, estimate a standard deviation of 4 percent for a mean return of education of about 7 percent. A natural explanation for idiosyncratic differences in the return to education are cognitive and non-cognitive abilities (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26 The first stage regressions often indicate that schooling is inversely related to smoking behavior. In the literature, this finding is often interpreted as evidence that risk averse individuals (those who smoke less), or individuals with higher discount rates, obtain more schooling.…”
Section: Comparing Our Results With the Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is not always readily available. Random coefficients models allow for parameter heterogeneity and estimation in a cross-section, but are subject to the same functional form restrictions as typical panel data estimators (Harmon, Hogan and Walker 2003). Specifically, if the specified parametric functional form is incorrect, estimation generally leads to inconsistent estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%