1997
DOI: 10.1080/13632469708962365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Displacement-Based Seismic Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
206
2
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
7
206
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…19). From an analysis of the results, from the uniaxial results the proposals of Kowalsky [25], Priestley [16] and Priestley et al [17] present a better correlation to the experimental results (R > 0.7), as represented in Fig. 20.…”
Section: Empirical Proposals For Equivalent Damping In Rc Elements Unmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…19). From an analysis of the results, from the uniaxial results the proposals of Kowalsky [25], Priestley [16] and Priestley et al [17] present a better correlation to the experimental results (R > 0.7), as represented in Fig. 20.…”
Section: Empirical Proposals For Equivalent Damping In Rc Elements Unmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The equivalent damping depends on the structural displacement ductility demand and the location of the plastic hinges in the elements [16]. It may be interpreted as the superposition of the elastic and hysteretic damping as shown in Expression 5, wherein the symbol ''+'' stands for superposition rather than a trivial summation.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Equivalent Damping From Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The starting point of the design 31 scheme is to define the acceptable stress level in the joint, based on principle tensile stresses p t or principle compression stresses, p c , in the case of interior joints. As noted in the literature 33 [20], principal stresses are more reliable than nominal shear stresses in capturing the response of joints, since they consider the actual stress state of the joint given by a combination of the 35 nominal shear force, V jh (or corresponding stress, v jh ) with the column axial load (N ). The…”
Section: Step-by-step Haunch Design Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strength degradation curves for existing beam-column joints based on principle 3 tensile/compression stresses as a function of the joint shear deformation have been proposed in the literature [3,6,20]. Values of the principal tensile stress of approximately p t = 0.2 f c , f c being 5 the concrete compression strength, have been for example proposed by Pampanin et al [6] to correspond to first cracking of exterior beam-column joints with plain round bars and end hooks.…”
Section: Step-by-step Haunch Design Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%