Dispositional Sources of Managerial Discretion: CEO Ideology, CEO Personality, and Firm Strategies

Abstract

We investigate the dispositional sources of managerial discretion by theorizing that CEOs’ personality traits affect the extent to which their firms’ strategies reflect their preferences. In a longitudinal study of Fortune 500 firms, we examine the moderating influence of two personality traits—narcissism and extraversion—on the relationship between CEOs’ liberal- or conservative-leaning political ideologies and two firm strategies: corporate social responsibility (CSR) and workforce downsizing. We anticipate and confirm that liberal-leaning CEOs are more likely than others to enact CSR practices, and conservative-leaning CEOs are more likely than others to engage in downsizing. We find that extraversion strengthens these effects: it increases liberal CEOs’ use of CSR and conservative CEOs’ use of downsizing. Narcissism likewise strengthens the effect of CEO liberalism on CSR, but it does not significantly moderate the effect of CEO conservatism on downsizing. In a supplementary study using primary data from working professionals, we further explore the distinct mechanisms associated with these two personality traits. We find that narcissism relates strongly to individuals’ inflated perception of their discretion, whereas extraversion relates to their ability to sell an issue to others. Our study furthers research on managerial discretion by providing nuanced theory and evidence on innate sources of CEOs’ influence, and it enhances research on CEOs’ political ideology by spotlighting the dispositional boundary conditions of its effects on firms’ strategies.

Measuring CEO personality: Developing, validating, and testing a linguistic tool

“…We also believe that our approach is complementary to, rather than a substitute for, closed‐language approaches or other methodologies such as videometric assessment (e.g., Gupta, Nadkarni, & Mariam, ; Hill et al, ; Petrenko, Aime, Ridge, & Hill, ). In developing our open‐language tool, we relied on videometric data to obtain observer scores of CEOs' personality traits, which we needed to validate the tool with a psychometrically sound personality instrument.…”

The Value of Speaking for “Us”: the Relationship Between CEOs’ Use of I- and We-Referencing Language and Subsequent Organizational Performance

“…At the same time, Gupta et al (2018) suggest that Ifocused CEOs "create environments of passive followership" (p. 12) rather than engaged followership within their organization (Haslam and Platow 2001). In this regard, high levels of CEO's use of I-referencing language (i.e., first-person singular pronouns)-which signals CEOs' strong personal identity-should fail to engage organizational members' and other stakeholders' sense of shared social identity (Fiol 2002) and thereby fail to engender improved performance.…”

The influence of responsible leadership on environmental innovation and environmental performance: The moderating role of managerial discretion

“…Following the studies by Jiang (2015), Ball, Shah, and Wowak (2018), and Gupta, Nadkarni, and Mariam (2019), this study used three items to measure managerial discretion. For example, the items included "There are abundant available resources that can be mobilized by the firm's top managers" and "The top managers of the firm generally have freedom in decision-making.…”