2010
DOI: 10.3171/2010.4.focus10104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disrupting abnormal electrical activity with deep brain stimulation: is epilepsy the next frontier?

Abstract: Given the tremendous success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of movement and neuropsychiatric disorders, clinicians have begun to open up to the possible use of electrical stimulation for the treatment of patients with uncontrolled seizures. This process has resulted in the discovery of a wide array of DBS targets, including the cerebellum, hypothalamus, hippocampus, basal ganglia, and various thalamic nuclei. Despite the ambiguity of the mechanism of action and the unknowns surroundi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent Cochrane review of three trials of cerebellar stimulation ( Van Buren et al, 1978 ; Wright et al, 1984 ; Velasco et al, 2005 ) found that there was simply insufficient evidence to make conclusive statements on the efficacy of cerebellar stimulation ( Sprengers et al, 2014 ). The mixed results in human studies has also contributed to the weakened enthusiasm for the potential of cerebellar-directed intervention, and despite the continued listing of the cerebellum as a potential target in reviews of electrical stimulation for epilepsy ( Theodore and Fisher, 2004 ; Morrell, 2006 ; Boon et al, 2007 ; Karceski, 2007 ; Krauss and Koubeissi, 2007 ; Ellis and Stevens, 2008 ; Hamani et al, 2009 ; Lockman and Fisher, 2009 ; Saillet et al, 2009 ; Wyckhuys et al, 2009 ; Kahane and Depaulis, 2010 ; Lega et al, 2010 ; Rahman et al, 2010 ; Zhong et al, 2011 ; Tykocki et al, 2012 ; Fisher, 2013 ; Ge et al, 2013 ; Fisher and Velasco, 2014 ; Laxpati et al, 2014 ), relatively little recent experimental work has actually examined this topic. While our results clearly support renewed interest in the cerebellum as a potential intervention target, future translational success will require identifying the appropriate population for this intervention (e.g., perhaps patients with temporal lobe epilepsy), the appropriate location for intervention (e.g., the midline), the appropriate stimulation parameters (e.g., to activate, rather than inhibit, the midline), an appropriate sample same size, improvements in surgical procedures including device implantation (to avoid electrode migration), and possibly the implementation of an on-demand, responsive system to control the timing of intervention ( Fountas et al, 2010 ; Rahman et al, 2010 ; Armstrong et al, 2013 ; Heck et al, 2014 ; Sprengers et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent Cochrane review of three trials of cerebellar stimulation ( Van Buren et al, 1978 ; Wright et al, 1984 ; Velasco et al, 2005 ) found that there was simply insufficient evidence to make conclusive statements on the efficacy of cerebellar stimulation ( Sprengers et al, 2014 ). The mixed results in human studies has also contributed to the weakened enthusiasm for the potential of cerebellar-directed intervention, and despite the continued listing of the cerebellum as a potential target in reviews of electrical stimulation for epilepsy ( Theodore and Fisher, 2004 ; Morrell, 2006 ; Boon et al, 2007 ; Karceski, 2007 ; Krauss and Koubeissi, 2007 ; Ellis and Stevens, 2008 ; Hamani et al, 2009 ; Lockman and Fisher, 2009 ; Saillet et al, 2009 ; Wyckhuys et al, 2009 ; Kahane and Depaulis, 2010 ; Lega et al, 2010 ; Rahman et al, 2010 ; Zhong et al, 2011 ; Tykocki et al, 2012 ; Fisher, 2013 ; Ge et al, 2013 ; Fisher and Velasco, 2014 ; Laxpati et al, 2014 ), relatively little recent experimental work has actually examined this topic. While our results clearly support renewed interest in the cerebellum as a potential intervention target, future translational success will require identifying the appropriate population for this intervention (e.g., perhaps patients with temporal lobe epilepsy), the appropriate location for intervention (e.g., the midline), the appropriate stimulation parameters (e.g., to activate, rather than inhibit, the midline), an appropriate sample same size, improvements in surgical procedures including device implantation (to avoid electrode migration), and possibly the implementation of an on-demand, responsive system to control the timing of intervention ( Fountas et al, 2010 ; Rahman et al, 2010 ; Armstrong et al, 2013 ; Heck et al, 2014 ; Sprengers et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimulation of the pHyp also modulates the electrical activity on the mammillary bodies (MB), which have connections with the anterior nucleus of the thalamus via the mamillothalamic fascicle of Vicq d'Azir (MMT) (Fig. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In kleineren Fallserien wurden verschiedene Targets beschrieben wie der Hypothalamus, der Hippokampus, das Zere-bellum, der Nucleus subthalamicus, der Nucleus centromedianus thalami, der anteriore Thalamuskern sowie der Nucleus caudatus. Alle Studien zeigten einen mehr oder minder begrenzten Erfolg [49]. Der eigentliche Wirkmechanismus der DBS ist nur bedingt geklärt, es werden aber Veränderungen der Neurotransmitterausschüttung und Modifikationen im neuronalen Netzwerk beschrieben z.…”
Section: Prinzip Der Rationalen Polytherapieunclassified