2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11422-016-9786-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruptive innovation, labor markets, and Big Valley STEM School: network analysis in STEM education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also possible to conduct testing of children both in order to test knowledge, and for the purpose of psychological and pedagogical diagnosis. It is at the stage of formation of the school network that the following facts come to light [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible to conduct testing of children both in order to test knowledge, and for the purpose of psychological and pedagogical diagnosis. It is at the stage of formation of the school network that the following facts come to light [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Education innovation is understood as a procedure of educational activity and is used to increase the level of efficiency in a competitive environment (Mykhailyshyn & Kondur, 2018). Education innovation includes pedagogical innovation, considering a technological, digital-based learning environment, and matter of integration among different levels (Pisanu, 2014;Fındıkoğlu & İlhan, 2016;Lindfors & Hilmola, 2016;Ellison, 2016) state that innovation in education is needed to incorporate old and new technologies and educational environments that already exist may be adapted and upgraded through the use of technology. Innovation methods in children's learning at home these skills using different sets of competencies (perseverance, self-control, enthusiasm), ability to work with others (cordiality, respect, care), and ability to manage emotions (calmness, optimism, confidence) (Kovacs, 2017).…”
Section: Problem Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the agenda of access and equity invoked in the social justice perspective in science education involves varying entry points including epistemological concerns, e.g., the integration of other knowledges (multiscience approach) in the science curriculum and research on science education (Aikenhead & Jegede, 1999;Cajete, 1999;Gitari, 2003Gitari, , 2006Hewson, 2015;Hodson, 1993;Kim et al, 2017;Ogunniyi, 1988Ogunniyi, , 2011; race, diversity, and social conditions of learning science in urban settings (Atwater, 2010;Barton & Tan, 2018;Emdin, 2011;Roth & Lee, 2004); appropriation of school science in everyday life, informal education, and care for the environment and ecosystems (Dawson, 2017;Burke et al, 2018;Pedretti & Nazir, 2011); disrupting of the neoliberal agenda in STEM (Alsop & Bencze, 2012;Ellison & Allen, 2018;Carter, 2005;Kumashiro, 2018). Work on social justice is evident in other STEM disciplines: technology and engineering (Ezeife, 2016); Mathematics (Dahl, 2008;Esmonde, 2014;Ezeife, 2016;Gates & Jorgensen, 2009;Varghese & McCusker, 2006).…”
Section: Social Justice Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The science/STEM education literature advises nation states to be informed of hybridized factors inherent in the environment in which STEM curricula is implemented (Ellison & Allen, 2018;Kumashiro, 2018). Being cognizance requires reform stakeholders to develop in-depth and extensive theoretical frameworks for STEM curricula.…”
Section: Is the Enactment Of Endogenous Stem Probable In Kenya?mentioning
confidence: 99%