2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13062-015-0068-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

dissectHMMER: a HMMER-based score dissection framework that statistically evaluates fold-critical sequence segments for domain fold similarity

Abstract: BackgroundAnnotation transfer for function and structure within the sequence homology concept essentially requires protein sequence similarity for the secondary structural blocks forming the fold of a protein. A simplistic similarity approach in the case of non-globular segments (coiled coils, low complexity regions, transmembrane regions, long loops, etc.) is not justified and a pertinent source for mistaken homologies. The latter is either due to positional sequence conservation as a result of a very simple,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, it is the fold-critical parts (the supposedly 3D structural part) of a sequence-to-domain alignment that argues for a similar overall fold, hence similar function whereas the remnant part represents disordered, fibrillary or other non-globular regions that might be not obligatory for the domain fold [13, 14, 24]. As such, the E-values of the fold-critical contributions has to be more significant than the remnant parts to justify for annotation transfer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Briefly, it is the fold-critical parts (the supposedly 3D structural part) of a sequence-to-domain alignment that argues for a similar overall fold, hence similar function whereas the remnant part represents disordered, fibrillary or other non-globular regions that might be not obligatory for the domain fold [13, 14, 24]. As such, the E-values of the fold-critical contributions has to be more significant than the remnant parts to justify for annotation transfer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8, the ÎČ glocal HMMER2 and Îł local HMMER3 sequence-to-domain hits can be stratified into paired HMMER2/HMMER3 hits, HMMER2-only hits and HMMER3-only hits. More specifically, the paired hits are HMMER2 and HMMER3 hits where the domain model sequences overlap (see dissectHMMER for details [13, 14]). The orphaned HMMER2 and HMMER3 hits are those that are found only by the HMMER variant itself.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prediction of transmembrane domain and NLS were performed using TMHMM 5 and NucPred ( Brameier et al, 2007 ) based on a sequence score ≄ 0.5. Domains were predicted in local PuTTY based on HMMER 3.1b1 ( Wong et al, 2015 ) and the active conserved domains were blasted to the Pfam database ( Finn et al, 2014 ). A phylogenetic analysis of homologues was carried out using the maximum likelihood method with MEGA 5 ( Tamura et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, proteins with many transmembrane helices (TMs), low complexity regions or other non-globular segments remain difficult sequence-analytic targets as significance criteria break down due to the amino acid compositional bias [ 4 ]. For some functionally uncharacterized sequences, focusing the analysis on fold-critical segments [ 5 , 6 ] or on complex TMs (that carry an evolutionary signature versus simple, merely hydrophobic TMs) [ 7 , 8 ] can expand the reach of sequence similarity searches to previously not seen functionally annotated homologues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%