1996
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-998993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: Objective Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis, Treatment, and Assessment of Therapeutic Response

Abstract: Current concepts of the etiology, pathophysiology, clinical and laboratory diagnosis and management of fulminant and low-grade disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) have been presented. Considerable attention has been devoted to interrelationships within the hemostasis system. Only by clearly understanding the pathophysiological interrelationships can the clinician and laboratory scientist appreciate the divergent and wide spectrum of often confusing clinical and laboratory findings in patients with DIC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
183
0
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(271 reference statements)
0
183
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In broad terms, there are two major pathways that may cause DIC: (i) a systemic inflammatory response which activates the cytokine network and coagulation cascade (such as in severe sepsis and major trauma) and/or (ii) release or exposure of pro-coagulant material into the blood stream (such as in cancer or obstetric patients) (Levi et al 1997). Disseminated intravascular coagulation is a continuously progressing process, it can be subdivided into three phases: phase I -compensated activation of the haemostatic system, phase II -decompensated activation of the haemostatic system, phase III -full-blown DIC (Bick 1996). The pathologic process is characterized by widespread fibrin deposition in the microcirculation with subsequent ischemic damage, and by the development of a hemorrhagic diathesis caused by the consumption of procoagulans and hyperactivity of fibrinolysis (Morris 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In broad terms, there are two major pathways that may cause DIC: (i) a systemic inflammatory response which activates the cytokine network and coagulation cascade (such as in severe sepsis and major trauma) and/or (ii) release or exposure of pro-coagulant material into the blood stream (such as in cancer or obstetric patients) (Levi et al 1997). Disseminated intravascular coagulation is a continuously progressing process, it can be subdivided into three phases: phase I -compensated activation of the haemostatic system, phase II -decompensated activation of the haemostatic system, phase III -full-blown DIC (Bick 1996). The pathologic process is characterized by widespread fibrin deposition in the microcirculation with subsequent ischemic damage, and by the development of a hemorrhagic diathesis caused by the consumption of procoagulans and hyperactivity of fibrinolysis (Morris 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levels of significance were determined by non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U test, STATISTICA for Windows, version 5.1 release, StatSoft, Inc. 1984-1996. Any P value of 0.05 or lower was considered to be significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be a function of inhibitor breakdown and/or liver dysfunction affecting inhibitor production in dogs with babesiosis. Early and prolonged decreases in AT III activity are well documented during a systemic inflammatory response (Bick, 1996), suggesting that AT III activity could be the consequence of systemic inflammation resulting from babesiosis. Decreased AT III activity was also indicative of chronic DIC in babesiosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prolonged PT and aPTT is seen in 50-69% of cases (50) . This condition is related to the consumption of the coagulation factors.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 98%