2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2023.118695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissipation losses limiting first-order phase transition materials in cryogenic caloric cooling: A case study on all-d-metal Ni(-Co)-Mn-Ti Heusler alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Materials with first-order phase transitions, such as Gd5(SiGe)4 10 , Fe-Rh 11,12 , Ni-Mn-based Heusler alloys [13][14][15] , La(Fe,Si)13-type [16][17][18] and Fe2P-type 19,20 compounds, show large magnetocaloric effects due to field-induced magnetostructural transitions. However, they suffer from hysteresis losses [21][22][23][24] , degradation caused by mechanical failure due to large volume changes 20,25 and reduced magnetocaloric effects during cyclic magnetic field application 26,27 . Materials with second-order phase transitions, specifically the magnetic transition from ferro-to paramagnetic state at the Curie temperature 𝑇 𝐶 , are for instance Gd 28 , Gd-Y 8 , high entropy transition metal NiFeCoCrPd0.5 alloys 29 , Ni-Mn-based Heusler alloys 30,31 and Fe2AlB2 32,33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Materials with first-order phase transitions, such as Gd5(SiGe)4 10 , Fe-Rh 11,12 , Ni-Mn-based Heusler alloys [13][14][15] , La(Fe,Si)13-type [16][17][18] and Fe2P-type 19,20 compounds, show large magnetocaloric effects due to field-induced magnetostructural transitions. However, they suffer from hysteresis losses [21][22][23][24] , degradation caused by mechanical failure due to large volume changes 20,25 and reduced magnetocaloric effects during cyclic magnetic field application 26,27 . Materials with second-order phase transitions, specifically the magnetic transition from ferro-to paramagnetic state at the Curie temperature 𝑇 𝐶 , are for instance Gd 28 , Gd-Y 8 , high entropy transition metal NiFeCoCrPd0.5 alloys 29 , Ni-Mn-based Heusler alloys 30,31 and Fe2AlB2 32,33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the latter approach proposes a small inverse MCE down to lowest temperatures (open circles). This phenomenon can be explained by dissipative losses due to the hysteresis in materials with first-order phase transitions, as proposed by Beckmann et al [75]. These losses result in an adiabatic temperature change, estimated as ∆T diss = 0.5 • C −1 • µ 0 ¸HdM, where C is the heat capacity of the sample.…”
Section: ∆T Ad and Magnetizationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The sample with the thermocouple (and strain gauge if desired) is carefully placed inside the center coil as illustrated in figure 17(c). The voltage signal is recorded with the oscilloscope and then fine compensated numerically by a small correction using the field-induced signal of the pick-up coil and then integrated to magnetization [75]. In figure 18(b), we show the induced coil voltage and the calculated magnetization of the Fe-Rh example.…”
Section: Magnetizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermoelastic model to determine ∆𝐺 𝑒𝑙 𝑀−𝑃 and 𝐸 𝑖𝑟𝑟 𝑀−𝑃 is an approximation and does not include an asymmetric hysteresis or transformation behavior for forward and reverse transformation 51,52 , or an increase of the dissipative energy by increasing applied magnetic field 54,55 . Therefore, the calculation of 𝐸 𝑖𝑟𝑟 𝑀−𝑃 includes a number of uncertainties, however, since this model is applied to both samples, exhibiting a nearly identical chemical composition of the matrix phase and grain size, the relative difference of ∆𝐺 𝑒𝑙 𝑀−𝑃 and 𝐸 𝑖𝑟𝑟 𝑀−𝑃 between both samples can be determined and directly linked to the presence of the Gd-precipitates.…”
Section: Effect Of Hysteresis On the Thermoelastic Phase Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%