2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociation between pain and the nociceptive blink reflex during psychological arousal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a dissociation between pain and the NFR has been noted previously (e.g., Andersen et al, 1995;Bouhassira et al, 2003;Edwards et al, 2001Edwards et al, ,2002Edwards et al, ,2003aEdwards et al, ,2006McIntyre et al, 2006;Terkelsen et al, 2004;Willer et al, 1979). In addition, a similar dissociation has been recently reported between pain and the nociceptive blink reflex during psychological arousal (Koh and Drummond, 2006). However, given that the attenuated NFR thresholds in the computer game task condition in the present study meant that lower intensity electrocutaneous shocks were delivered, reports of less pain are most likely to be, at least to a large extent, an artefact of reduced stimulation intensity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a dissociation between pain and the NFR has been noted previously (e.g., Andersen et al, 1995;Bouhassira et al, 2003;Edwards et al, 2001Edwards et al, ,2002Edwards et al, ,2003aEdwards et al, ,2006McIntyre et al, 2006;Terkelsen et al, 2004;Willer et al, 1979). In addition, a similar dissociation has been recently reported between pain and the nociceptive blink reflex during psychological arousal (Koh and Drummond, 2006). However, given that the attenuated NFR thresholds in the computer game task condition in the present study meant that lower intensity electrocutaneous shocks were delivered, reports of less pain are most likely to be, at least to a large extent, an artefact of reduced stimulation intensity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It is worth noting, in contrast to the present study which included 63 and 115 participants in Experiments 1 and 2 respectively, many of the early NFR studies employed small samples. Given that the likelihood of a type I error is increased with a small sample size (Oakes, 1987), some of the confusion in the literature could derive from the early studies testing less than 20 participants, Finally, it is worth noting that secondary tasks have been shown to facilitate the nociceptive blink reflex (Koh and Drummond, 2006) as well as other spinal reflexes such as the tendon reflex (e.g., Bonnet et al, 1995) and the stretch reflex (e.g., McIntyre et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indices for excitability in the trigeminal sensory system we have chosen sensory and pain detection thresholds to supraorbital electrical stimuli as well as amplitude of the nociceptive-specific blink reflex (nBR), a brain stem reflex modified by cortical and subcortical afferents [22], [23], [24], [25]. To modulate the visual cortex, we used flash light stimulation or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at high or low stimulation frequency [26], [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a noncorrelation may be also due to a variability inherent in the methodology, this seems to be unlikely since pain and reflex amplitude reduction of the three different stimulation intensities were positively correlated in our setting. A dissociation between pain sensation and the nociceptive blink reflex has been previously found for psychological arousal induced by a mental task [18] and for the long-term depression induced by low-frequency stimulation [28] as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Here, too, under certain circumstances a dissociation between subjective report and reflex recordings can occur [18], but for many purposes this reflex yields a faithful measure of pain modulation [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%