2018
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociation of frontal‐midline delta‐theta and posterior alpha oscillations: A mobile EEG study

Abstract: Numerous reports have demonstrated low-frequency oscillations during navigation using invasive recordings in the hippocampus of both rats and human patients. Given evidence, in some cases, of low-frequency synchronization between midline cortex and hippocampus, it is also possible that low-frequency movement-related oscillations manifest in healthy human neocortex. However, this possibility remains largely unexplored, in part due to the difficulties of coupling free ambulation and effective scalp EEG recording… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, an increase is alpha power specifically was seen for the spatial reproduction task in the posterior region of interest. More generally, these findings provide continuing support for the involvement of theta, alpha and beta oscillations in the measurement of temporal and spatial intervals (Bischof and Boulanger, 2003;Hsieh, Ekstrom, & Ranganath, 2011;Liang, Starrett, & Ekstrom, 2018;Samaha et al, 2015;Vilhelmsen et al, 2015;Kononowicz & Rijn, 2015;Kulashekhar, Pekkola, Palva, & Palva, 2016;Javadi, et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In contrast, an increase is alpha power specifically was seen for the spatial reproduction task in the posterior region of interest. More generally, these findings provide continuing support for the involvement of theta, alpha and beta oscillations in the measurement of temporal and spatial intervals (Bischof and Boulanger, 2003;Hsieh, Ekstrom, & Ranganath, 2011;Liang, Starrett, & Ekstrom, 2018;Samaha et al, 2015;Vilhelmsen et al, 2015;Kononowicz & Rijn, 2015;Kulashekhar, Pekkola, Palva, & Palva, 2016;Javadi, et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In recent years, there has been an increase in behavioral work querying aspects of navigation using a hybrid VR-real world approach, where natural motion is yoked to movements within virtual environments (e.g., Chen X. et al, 2015 ; Chen et al, 2017 ; He and McNamara, 2018 ; Sjolund et al, 2018 ), which more closely parallels work carried out with rats. However, this hybrid approach is not generally combined with imaging techniques (although see Ehinger et al, 2014 ; Gehrke et al, 2018 ; Liang et al, 2018 ), so from a theoretical perspective, how the brain integrates sensory perception of environmental features and self-motion information from visual (optic flow), vestibular, proprioceptive and motor systems to support spatial navigation in humans remains an open question. VR will remain a powerful method for studying neural activity during active navigation, as it facilitates manipulations that are difficult or impossible to realize in the real-world.…”
Section: The Missing Piece: Moving Humans In Naturalistic Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, eye closure induces alpha power increases both at occipital sites and in hippocampus (Geller et al, 2014). Our current results would suggest differing roles in navigation for frontal midline theta (4-8 Hz) and occipital alpha (8-12 Hz), which were both found relevant to movement (Liang, Starrett, & Ekstrom, 2018), and frontal midline theta and occipital alpha oscillations can cooperate to support task-dependent spatial or temporal processing. Therefore, a helpful next step would be to determine how these signals coordinate between hippocampus and cortex in our task using ECoG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%