1963
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600520310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissolution Rate Studies II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fundamental differences between these models rely upon the interdependency between the diffusion layer thickness (h) and particle size (d). Indeed, while some authors, like Hixson and Crowell, 10 for example, assume h to be a constant, others considered h to be proportional to the particle diametersapproximately equal to the particle radius, like Higuchi and Hiestand, 11 or its square root, like Niebergall et al 12 Different algebraic relations between h and d result, obviously, in different equations for the integrated form of eq 1. These equations, together with the associated assumptions regarding the value of h and the corresponding dissolution rate constants are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Theoreticalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental differences between these models rely upon the interdependency between the diffusion layer thickness (h) and particle size (d). Indeed, while some authors, like Hixson and Crowell, 10 for example, assume h to be a constant, others considered h to be proportional to the particle diametersapproximately equal to the particle radius, like Higuchi and Hiestand, 11 or its square root, like Niebergall et al 12 Different algebraic relations between h and d result, obviously, in different equations for the integrated form of eq 1. These equations, together with the associated assumptions regarding the value of h and the corresponding dissolution rate constants are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Theoreticalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentages of drug released from the fibrous web were plotted against time. The drug release studies were carried out on PCL and PCL/PVP blended fibrous mat alone and the kinetics studies were carried out on the drug release from the mat using the Zero order, First order, Higuchi, Hixson-crowell and Peppas model as suggested in the literature [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: In Vitro Drug Release Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest and the simplest of such models was introduced by Hixson and Crowley in 1931 [24], and it is often termed the cube root law. Improvements to the model were proposed by Niebergall et al [25], and Higuchi and Hiestand [26]. The treatments became more elaborate with the studies by Carstensen and Musa [27], and by Brooke [28] [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%