Abstract. The availability of nutrients regulates terrestrial carbon cycling and modifies ecosystem responses to environmental changes. Nonetheless, nutrient availability is often overlooked in climate-carbon cycle studies because it depends on the interplay of various soil factors that would ideally be comprised into one metric. Such a metric does not currently exist. Here, 10 we used a Swedish forest inventory database that contains soil and tree growth data for >2500 forests across Sweden to test which combination soil factors best explains variation in plant growth, and to take the first steps in developing a nutrient availability metric. For the latter, we started from a (yet unvalidated) metric for constraints on nutrient availability that was previously developed by IIASA (Laxenburg, Austria). This IIASA-metric was developed for crops and uses only indirect indicators of nutrient availability. Our analyses revealed that soil organic carbon content (SOC) and the soil carbon to nitrogen 15 (C:N) ratio were the most important factors explaining variation in "normalized" (climate-independent) productivity.Normalized productivity increased with decreasing soil C:N ratio (R² = 0.02-0.13), while SOC exhibited an empirical optimum (R² = 0.05-0.15). The IIASA-metric was unrelated to normalized productivity (R² = 0.00-0.01), because the soil factors under consideration were not well implemented, and because the C:N ratio was not included. We upgraded this metric by incorporating soil C:N and adjusting the relationship between SOC and nutrient availability in view of the observed 20 relationship across our database. This upgraded metric explained a significant fraction of the variation (R² = 0.03-0.21; depending on the applied method) and thus opens up new opportunities to further validate and improve it with other datasets, from forests and from other ecosystem types, to ultimately develop a generic global nutrient availability metric.