2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12928-022-00857-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distal radial access and postprocedural ultrasound evaluation of proximal and distal radial artery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Norimatsu K et al found that although the DRA diameter in women was smaller than that in men, the difference was not significant (men: 2.6 mm, women: 2.5 mm, P = 0.08) ( 24 ). A similar conclusion was also obtained in a study by Horák D et al (Men: 2.32 mm, Women: 2.25 mm, P = 0.27) ( 36 ). Despite the conflicting findings, generally, the DRA diameter is larger in men than in women.…”
Section: Application Of Ultrasound In Distal Radial Artery Interventionssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, Norimatsu K et al found that although the DRA diameter in women was smaller than that in men, the difference was not significant (men: 2.6 mm, women: 2.5 mm, P = 0.08) ( 24 ). A similar conclusion was also obtained in a study by Horák D et al (Men: 2.32 mm, Women: 2.25 mm, P = 0.27) ( 36 ). Despite the conflicting findings, generally, the DRA diameter is larger in men than in women.…”
Section: Application Of Ultrasound In Distal Radial Artery Interventionssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…2.5 mm, P = 0.08) (24). A similar conclusion was also obtained in a study by Horák D et al (Men: 2.32 mm, Women: 2.25 mm, P = 0.27) (36). Despite the conflicting findings, generally, the DRA diameter is larger in men than in women.…”
Section: Distal Radial Artery Diameter and The Influencing Factorssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations