2018
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.171396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distance-dependent aposematism and camouflage in the cinnabar moth caterpillar (Tyria jacobaeae, Erebidae)

Abstract: Defended prey often use distinctive, conspicuous, colours to advertise their unprofitability to potential predators (aposematism). These warning signals are frequently made up of salient, high contrast, stripes which have been hypothesized to increase the speed and accuracy of predator avoidance learning. Limitations in predator visual acuity, however, mean that these patterns cannot be resolved when viewed from a distance, and adjacent patches of colour will blend together (pattern blending). We investigated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, it has been shown that patterns with strong internal contrast can increase conspicuousness (Aronsson & Gamberale-Stille, 2012b) but can also generate a disruptive effect (Stevens & Cuthill, 2006; Schaefer & Stobbe, 2006). Warning colourations can also be distance dependent, providing camouflage at greater distances while being conspicuous at close proximity (Tullberg, Merilaita & Wiklund, 2005; Barnett, Cuthill & Scott-Samuel, 2018). For instance, the contrasting bands of coral snake mimics and the zig-zag pattern of many vipers act as warning signals to predators (Pfennig, Harcombe & Pfennig, 2001; Wüster et al, 2004; Niskanen & Mappes, 2005) but these bands can also function in camouflage during motion through the flicker-fusion effect (Lindell & Forsman, 1996; Titcomb, Kikuchi & Pfennig, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it has been shown that patterns with strong internal contrast can increase conspicuousness (Aronsson & Gamberale-Stille, 2012b) but can also generate a disruptive effect (Stevens & Cuthill, 2006; Schaefer & Stobbe, 2006). Warning colourations can also be distance dependent, providing camouflage at greater distances while being conspicuous at close proximity (Tullberg, Merilaita & Wiklund, 2005; Barnett, Cuthill & Scott-Samuel, 2018). For instance, the contrasting bands of coral snake mimics and the zig-zag pattern of many vipers act as warning signals to predators (Pfennig, Harcombe & Pfennig, 2001; Wüster et al, 2004; Niskanen & Mappes, 2005) but these bands can also function in camouflage during motion through the flicker-fusion effect (Lindell & Forsman, 1996; Titcomb, Kikuchi & Pfennig, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, not all contrasting patterns are warning signals, and some warning signals can also be cryptic depending on receiver distance (Barnett et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, that match need only be accurate at the spatial frequency the viewer is sampling at; in other words, as limited by their visual acuity (Caves, Brandley & Johnsen, ). This allows the same pattern to function as camouflage at a distance, but a signal when the intended viewer is close (Endler, , ; Merilaita & Tullberg, ; Bohlin, Tullberg & Merilaita, ; Barnett & Cuthill, ; Barnett, Scott‐Samuel & Cuthill, ; Barnett et al ., ,b, ,b; Barnett, Cuthill & Scott‐Samuel, , ).…”
Section: Exploiting Receiver Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the background has an oriented texture, such as the vertical grain of bark on trees such as oak, then a background‐matching animal has to orient such that its texture matches (Sargent, ; Kang et al ., , ; Barnett et al ., ,b, ,b). This demands the ability to detect the background texture, not necessarily visually because tactile cues may suffice, and orient appropriately.…”
Section: Constraints On Camouflagementioning
confidence: 99%