1991
DOI: 10.1021/j100154a074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distance distribution function of sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles by x-ray scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
76
1
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
37
76
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…micelle of 5 -6.5 nni. Although previously reported analyses, which assume a sharp boundary between the head group region and the core, gave widely varying dimensions (Reiss-Husson and Luzzati, 1966;Kratky and Muller, 1982;Itri and Amaral, 1991), they all fall within the limits set by our simple two shell model. Our results are, however, more consistent with a model of a spherical micelle that has a diffuse boundary between head group and core regions.…”
Section: Structure Of the Sds/micellesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…micelle of 5 -6.5 nni. Although previously reported analyses, which assume a sharp boundary between the head group region and the core, gave widely varying dimensions (Reiss-Husson and Luzzati, 1966;Kratky and Muller, 1982;Itri and Amaral, 1991), they all fall within the limits set by our simple two shell model. Our results are, however, more consistent with a model of a spherical micelle that has a diffuse boundary between head group and core regions.…”
Section: Structure Of the Sds/micellesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…[13] This model was confirmed by techniques based on electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). [16] It has been postulated that the small size of the micelles (typical diameter 5 nm [17] ) used in these studies may have artificially constrained the protein into a horseshoe structure, and subsequent studies were performed on small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) and bicelles. Of the eight studies published on this issue to date, three support the horseshoe [18][19][20] conformation, and five the extended [5,[21][22][23][24] conformation, despite using similar experimental techniques and often with only slight variations in experimental conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bruce et al publish 2.20 nm; [11] Itri and Amaral determined R mic 2.23 nm from X-ray scattering; [30] 2.19 nm are obtained by adding 0.468 nm [33] for the headgroup diameter to the core radius reported by Bockstahl and Dupla √tre, R c 1.75 nm). [32] As for R, there is good agreement between the DRS result and the other approaches quoted above, all claiming that SDS micelles are nearly spherical in the investigated concentration range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%