1995
DOI: 10.1016/0195-6698(95)90006-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distance-regular graphs with Γ(x)≃3∗Ka+1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, using the fact that if is triangle-free then l (1,1,k−2) ≤ 3 holds [11], we can also extend our proof of Theorem 1.2 to show that there are finitely many triangle-free distance-regular graphs that have degrees 8 or 9. An extension of the proof of Corollary 1.2 can then be used to show that there are finitely many distance-regular graphs with degrees 8 and 9 (indeed, the only case that needs to be considered is k = 8 and a 1 = 1, since this is not covered by the results of Yamazaki given in [17]). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, using the fact that if is triangle-free then l (1,1,k−2) ≤ 3 holds [11], we can also extend our proof of Theorem 1.2 to show that there are finitely many triangle-free distance-regular graphs that have degrees 8 or 9. An extension of the proof of Corollary 1.2 can then be used to show that there are finitely many distance-regular graphs with degrees 8 and 9 (indeed, the only case that needs to be considered is k = 8 and a 1 = 1, since this is not covered by the results of Yamazaki given in [17]). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, the Bannai-Ito conjecture has been shown to hold for several special classes of distance-regular graphs: for example, Bannai and Ito showed that it holds for the class of bipartite distance-regular graphs, Mohar and Shawe-Taylor [15] and independently Brouwer [8,Theorem 4.2.16] showed that it holds for the class of distanceregular line graphs that are not polygons, and Hiraki et al [12] and Yamazaki [17] showed that it holds for the class of distance-regular graphs with k = 3(a 1 + 1), a 1 ≥ 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Yamazaki [21] considered distance-regular graphs which are locally a disjoint union of three cliques of size a 1 + 1, and for a 1 1 these graphs are geometric distance-regular graphs with smallest eigenvalue −3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence θ 3 = −5 and thus 2 ≤ ψ 1 ≤ 4 and ψ 1 ≥ Remark 4.6 It seems to be difficult to classify distance-regular graphs with θ D = −3 satisfying k = 3(a 1 + 1) and c 2 = 1 (see [4,38]). It follows by [4], [7] and [38] that any distance-regular graph in Theorem 4.5 (9) (i.e., a distance-regular graph with θ D = −3 satisfying k = 3(a 1 + 1), c 2 = 1 and a 1 , …”
Section: Since Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hiraki, Nomura and Suzuki [24] and Yamazaki [38] considered distance-regular graphs that are locally a disjoint union of three cliques of size a 1 + 1 (i.e., 4-claw-free), and these graphs for a 1 ≥ 1 turn out to be geometric with smallest eigenvalue −3 (see Remark 4.6). The problem of classification of such graphs seems to be very hard.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%