2011
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2011.568804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distances, Knowledge Brokerage and Absorptive Capacity in Enhancing Regional Innovativeness: A Qualitative Case Study of Lahti Region, Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is found that the frontline employees possessing high levels of absorptive capacity are more able to work as knowledge brokers for the customers (to obtain knowledge from the organisation and provide knowledge for the customer) and then for the organisation (to obtain knowledge from the customers and then transfer this knowledge to the organisation). These findings are also consistent with the study by Parjanen, Melkas, and Uotila (2011), which suggested high levels of absorptive capacity help knowledge brokers to bridge the knowledge gap.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, it is found that the frontline employees possessing high levels of absorptive capacity are more able to work as knowledge brokers for the customers (to obtain knowledge from the organisation and provide knowledge for the customer) and then for the organisation (to obtain knowledge from the customers and then transfer this knowledge to the organisation). These findings are also consistent with the study by Parjanen, Melkas, and Uotila (2011), which suggested high levels of absorptive capacity help knowledge brokers to bridge the knowledge gap.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The main reason for this is that contributors with a too large knowledge overlap might end up being too narrow minded (Beretta, 2019). More specifically, on the one hand it is likely that too much familiarity might lead to a cognitive lock-in of contributors (Parjanen et al, 2011) and thus a lower acceptance of new ideas. On the other hand, contributors with a large knowledge overlap normally have more specific and critical assessment criteria for ideas (Magnusson et al, 2016), something which would increase the risk of rejecting also potentially valuable ideas.…”
Section: Knowledge Overlapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial influences (Area 1 in Figure 1), with specifically locational influences on innovation, have been considered in the literatures on geographical proximity and knowledge transfer (Parjanen, Melkas, and Uotila 2011), regional innovation systems (Braczyk, Cooke, and Heidenreich 1998;Buesa et al 2006), structures and policy, with a particular focus on the impact of regional inequalities. Local contributors to innovation have also been considered (Shum and Watanabe 2008), along with the innovation effects of firms' location in metropolitan environments (Shefer and Frenkel 1998;Shefer, Frenkel, and Roper 2003).…”
Section: Knowledge Context -Towards An Integrated Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%