2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distant-detector versus integrating sphere measurements for estimating tissue optical parameters: A comparative experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kubelka-Munk is an inverse model used to relate tissue reflectance and transmittance with its optical parameters by assuming two propagating fluxes inside the tissue. It can be used for that purpose using diffuse measurements obtained with integrating sphere or distant detector, 33 the later approach provides spatially resolved diffuse reflectance-transmittance that is defined as tissue diffuse reflectance-transmittance at different spatial distance from the source. In the present study, we assumed that the spatial frequency-dependent reflectance and transmittances R d f x ð Þ and T d f x ð Þ could be analogues to the common spatially resolved diffuse reflectance and transmittances (R d and T d ) measured using distant detector.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kubelka-Munk is an inverse model used to relate tissue reflectance and transmittance with its optical parameters by assuming two propagating fluxes inside the tissue. It can be used for that purpose using diffuse measurements obtained with integrating sphere or distant detector, 33 the later approach provides spatially resolved diffuse reflectance-transmittance that is defined as tissue diffuse reflectance-transmittance at different spatial distance from the source. In the present study, we assumed that the spatial frequency-dependent reflectance and transmittances R d f x ð Þ and T d f x ð Þ could be analogues to the common spatially resolved diffuse reflectance and transmittances (R d and T d ) measured using distant detector.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has different ports for light entry and detector placing [39]. Additionally, the studied tissue sample was placed in different positions for collecting reflectance and transmittance separately [21] as demonstrated in Figure 1a,b. Figure 1c demonstrates the experimental configuration for measuring the collimating transmittance T c .…”
Section: Tissue Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tissue absorption and scattering coefficients are extracted indirectly using the experimental measurements of light diffuse reflectance and transmittance [17]. Such measurements are obtained via either integrating-sphere-based [18,19] or distant-detector-based systems [20,21]. An inverse mathematical model is then used to retrieve the optical coefficients from the diffuse light measurements [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique is called “diffuse” because light propagation in tissues at that optical region follows a diffusion process due to light’s dense and multiple scattering behavior [ 47 , 48 ]. Determining absorption and scattering parameters requires knowledge of tissue reflectance and transmittance, which can be measured using either an integrating sphere or a distant detector [ 49 , 50 ]. The optical parameters were estimated based on the measured diffused light [ 51 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%