2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct electrophysiological potentials for intention in action and prior intention for action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether to commit this intention can be determined by a final decision process. c o r t e x 6 5 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 1 4 9 e1 5 8 intention to act even without immediate movement execution (Jo, Wittmann, Borghardt, et al, 2014;Vinding, Jensen, & Overgaard, 2014). Furthermore, voluntary actions that were following the subjective experience of intention resulted in higher RP amplitude as compared to the actions that were performed during the absence of intention experience (Jo, Wittmann, Borghardt, et al, 2014;Keller & Heckhausen, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whether to commit this intention can be determined by a final decision process. c o r t e x 6 5 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 1 4 9 e1 5 8 intention to act even without immediate movement execution (Jo, Wittmann, Borghardt, et al, 2014;Vinding, Jensen, & Overgaard, 2014). Furthermore, voluntary actions that were following the subjective experience of intention resulted in higher RP amplitude as compared to the actions that were performed during the absence of intention experience (Jo, Wittmann, Borghardt, et al, 2014;Keller & Heckhausen, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The ethics committee of the University Medical Center Freiburg approved of this study and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The 14 item short form of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI, Walach, Buchheld, Buttenmü ller, Kleinknecht, & Schmidt, 2006) was administered to assess the level of selfreported mindfulness. It has a two-dimensional structure with the factor "presence" referring to the ability to attend to the present moment and the factor "acceptance" referring to a non-judgmental attitude (Kohls, Sauer, & Walach, 2009).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is prevalent in philosophy of mind (Bratman 1987;Pacherie 2008;Searle 1983), and-either explicitly or implicitly-in cognitive psychology and neuroscience Lafargue and Duffau 2008;Lau et al 2004;Quian Quiroga et al 2006;Sirigu et al 2004;Vinding et al 2014). Here we will challenge this latter notion by arguing that the neural mechanisms of action generation and control that are currently known are not compatible with the idea of discrete localizable states as the causes of action (see also ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A few studies have investigated the difference between proximal intentions and delayed intentions (Vinding et al, 2013, 2014) 1 . Participants were instructed to either act immediately, or wait a certain time-interval before acting, when they experienced the intention to act.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous experiments, a fixed intermediate delay was used between the time, intentions were formed, and the time, the intentions were realized into actions (Vinding et al, 2013, 2014). It was not addressed if the effect of delayed intentions changed as a consequence of the delay period per se .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%